🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <685@digigw.digital.co.jp>, gday@digigw.digital.co.jp (Gordon Day) writes:
} In article <1990Oct21.204236.22011@nada.kth.se>, d87-vik@dront.nada.kth.se (Ville K{rkk{inen) writes:
} } [Wishes to access BP from C source level in MSoft C.]

} Unfortunately, you can't do this from Microsoft C (at least, not without some
} inline assembler).

} The reason is that the definition 
} of the language doesn't support the idea of "named" registers, that is, a 
} mapping of a special variable name directly to a physical machine register.  
} There is nothing stopping a compiler implementor from doing this (e.g. the 
} VAX based BSD4.3 C compiler), but no compilers (to my knowledge) on the PC do,

You may be interested to know that Turbo C does provide this facility.  Thus,
one can write:

	_AX = 1;

and the AX register gets the value 1.  You must, however, keep your brain 
engaged when using this facility, I once coded the following:

	_AX = foo;
	_BX = this + that;

Afterwords, both AX and BX contained the value of the expression "this + that."
Imagine that!  The compiler used the AX register to calculate the value of
the expression, clobbering what I had put in there beforehand... just like you
would expect.

regards, Larry
-- 
Larry A. Shurr (cbnmva!las@att.ATT.COM or att!cbnmva!las)
The end of the world has been delayed due to a shortage of trumpet players.
(The above reflects my opinions, not those of AGS or AT&T, but you knew that.)