Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #3151Re: Microsoft Assembler Complaints
From: Albert Zhou
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 1990 14:14
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 1990 14:14
5 lines
873 bytes
873 bytes
>Both OPTASM (by SLR Systems) and TASM (v2.0) are at least two or
>three times as fast as MASM, produce better code, and have more
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Isn't one-to-one translation from Assembly to machine codes. How come "better"
code?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11547@j.cc.purdue.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!brazil.psych.purdue.edu!zhouReferences:
<WEISS.90Nov19164930@toucan.lcs.mit.edu> <9078@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!j.cc.purdue.edu!brazil.psych.purdue.edu!zhou From: zhou@brazil.psych.purdue.edu (Albert Zhou) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: Microsoft Assembler Complaints Message-ID: <11547@j.cc.purdue.edu> Date: 23 Nov 90 14:14:40 GMT References: <WEISS.90Nov19164930@toucan.lcs.mit.edu> <9078@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> Sender: news@j.cc.purdue.edu Reply-To: zhou@brazil.psych.purdue.edu (Albert Zhou) Distribution: comp Organization: Purdue University Lines: 5