Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #3432Re: Recommendations and opinions solicited
From: George Jetson
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 16:33
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 16:33
44 lines
2813 bytes
2813 bytes
In article <1992Sep29.135335.2625@exu.ericsson.se> exuhag@exu.ericsson.se writes: >I've been a registered used of A86 since 1988 and it is an excellent >product. Some people have a thing against Mr. Isaacson's "attitude" >but I agree with him in almost all cases, so this has never bothered >me. In fact, I applaud his changes to and simplifications of things >which have been blindly perpetuated by every other company. Agreed on all counts. I *love* his attitude. >A86 can create either COM files (linking is not necessary) or OBJ >files. The OBJ files are linkable with every language I've tried: >Turbo C, Turbo Pascal, and Stony Brook Pascal+. No problems. This is a real plus. I think the standard instructions for creating .COM files from assmbler source are rediculous. (MASM ...;link ...;exe2bin ...;del foo.exe) -> Yuck! >There is a downside to this, though. If you buy a Borland product, >which most people seem to these days, A86 is usable but doesn't >integrate well into the "Borland scheme of things." That is, you >can't use A86 to process the assembly code produced by Turbo C True, but not all that big of a deal. A86 went to some pains to provide Turbo C compatibility, but it broke somewhere around the release of Borland C++ 2.0. My feeling is that if you need to use the Borland products, you pretty much have to use TASM, but no biggie, because TASM is included in most of the Borland packages, so it's not like you have to buy something extra. A86 is *real* good for learning and using pure assembler. That is its calling. I think of MASM/TASM as languages that exist to support other languages (i.e., the HLL products of their respective companies), not as languages that anyone would actually program in. ************************************************************************ A note to new readers: the weasely :-) symbol is frowned upon in this group. Any questions, see Phil Gustafson who will gladly rearrange your diodes for you. - From the AFU FAQ - - pynq@quads.uchicago.edu, who is still costing the net hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars, every time he posts - ************************************************************************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep29.163352.15098@midway.uchicago.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!daffy!uwvax!uchinews!quads!pynqReferences:
<1992Sep29.011553.1333@amd.com> <1992Sep29.135335.2625@exu.ericsson.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!daffy!uwvax!uchinews!quads!pynq From: pynq@quads.uchicago.edu (George Jetson) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: Recommendations and opinions solicited Message-ID: <1992Sep29.163352.15098@midway.uchicago.edu> Date: 29 Sep 92 16:33:52 GMT Article-I.D.: midway.1992Sep29.163352.15098 References: <1992Sep29.011553.1333@amd.com> <1992Sep29.135335.2625@exu.ericsson.se> Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System) Reply-To: pynq@midway.uchicago.edu Organization: D. J. Dougherty & Associates Lines: 44