Re: "Sorry if this is an FAQ" Re: Hardware information

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #3748

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#3748

From: Philip Jeuck
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1992 22:20

20 lines
1296 bytes

In article <BvwH68.FGJ@NCoast.ORG> brown@NCoast.ORG (Stan Brown) writes:
>In article <718326448snx@bilton.demon.co.uk> johnb@bilton.demon.co.uk (John 
Burton) writes:>>
>>I apologise inadvance if this is an FAQ. 

>I can understand laziness; I often share it.  What I don't understand is
>a sort of aggressively proclaimed laziness, thinly disguised under a
>pseudo-apology.

>Am I missing the point here?  Is there another interpretation, one that
>does more credit to the original writer (and to the hundreds of others
>who post essentially the same thing)?

Well maybe he has the same problem I have - the FAQ's have been expired both 
here and in news.answers on the system I read news on.  So although I 
just looked I could not access any FAQ's for any comp.os.msdos 
newsgroup.

Phil Jeuck
jeuck@unix.sri.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <jeuck.25.0@unix.sri.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!unix!unix.sri.com!jeuck

References: <718326448snx@bilton.demon.co.uk> <BvwH68.FGJ@NCoast.ORG>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!unix!unix.sri.com!jeuck
From: jeuck@unix.sri.com (Philip Jeuck)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: "Sorry if this is an FAQ" Re: Hardware information
Keywords: Warning: I'm on the warpath again.
Message-ID: <jeuck.25.0@unix.sri.com>
Date: 12 Oct 92 22:20:48 GMT
References: <718326448snx@bilton.demon.co.uk> <BvwH68.FGJ@NCoast.ORG>
Sender: news@unix.SRI.COM
Organization: SRI International
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message