🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <773@csource.oz.au> david@csource.oz.au (david nugent) writes:
>In <1991Jan5.043055.17637@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu> yawei@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (mr. yawei) writes:
>
>> If you must use the timer interrupts, appending to int 8 is preferrable 
>> than attaching to int 1Ch.
>
>How so?
>
>Using the timer (hardware) interrupt is guaranteed to cause problems where
>some previously installed TSR or device driver speeds up the timer rate.
>Normally such programs filter those to make any "higher level" timer
>handler receive control at the correct rate.
>
>Also, the PIC is rearmed by the time INT 1cH gets control, so you don't
>have to fiddle around with EOI's at all.  It's an "ideal" place to pop-up.

Are you sure that the PIC is rearmed? I read that hardware interrupts
are still locked out at the time that the 1Ch handler gets control, and
that you can compromise things like interrupt-driven comm programs using the 
serial ports if you dawdle too long in EITHER an INT08 handler or in an INT1C 
handler. [Reference: Dettmann's _DOS Programmer's Reference, 2nd Ed._, p. 512]

_____________________________________________________________________________
Bob Davis, UofALA alum \\ INTERNET: sonny@trantor.harris-atd.com  |  _   _  |
Harris Corporation, ESS \\    UUCP: ...!uunet!x102a!trantor!sonny |_| |_| | |
Advanced Technology Dept.\\ AETHER: K4VNO          |==============|_/\/\/\|_|
PO Box 37, MS 3A/1912     \\ VOICE: (407) 727-5886 | I SPEAK ONLY | |_| |_| |
Melbourne, FL 32902        \\  FAX: (407) 729-2537 | FOR MYSELF.  |_________|