🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #4194

TurboC 2.0 & TurboC++: Speed and Debugger

#4194
From: KiYun Roe
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 1991 13:10
17 lines
1102 bytes
Could anyone please tell me if there is any difference in compilation
speed between TurboC 2.0 and TurboC++ when compiling C code using the
command-line versions of the compilers?  I'm thinking of upgrading from
TurboC Pro to TurboC++ Pro, but I only have an XT level system.  I
don't want the make process to become appreciably slower.

While I'm at it, is there any significant difference between TD 1.0 and
TD 2.0 other than reverse execution?  Does TD 2.0 continue to work well
from the keyboard without a mouse?

Thanks.

--
KiYun Roe					kroe@sbcs.sunysb.edu
Department of Computer Science
SUNY at Stony Brook
Stony Brook, NY  11794-4400			(516) 632-7675
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991Jan9.131031.21220@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!sbcs!usenet

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cmcl2!sbcs!usenet
From: kroe@sbcs.sunysb.edu (KiYun Roe)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: TurboC 2.0 & TurboC++: Speed and Debugger
Message-ID: <1991Jan9.131031.21220@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
Date: 9 Jan 91 13:10:31 GMT
Sender: usenet@sbcs.sunysb.edu (Usenet poster)
Distribution: na
Organization: State University of New York at Stony Brook
Lines: 17