Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #4198Re: TurboC 2.0 & TurboC++: Speed and Debugger
From: Tiny Bubbles...
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 1991 19:09
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 1991 19:09
19 lines
1395 bytes
1395 bytes
In <1991Jan9.131031.21220@sbcs.sunysb.edu> kroe@sbcs.sunysb.edu (KiYun Roe) writes:
>speed between TurboC 2.0 and TurboC++ when compiling C code using the
>command-line versions of the compilers? I'm thinking of upgrading from
>TurboC Pro to TurboC++ Pro, but I only have an XT level system. I
I want to know, too.
My main reason is this: there was some patch info for TC++ 1.01 that
was circulating earlier -- I believe it was a Borland "patch list" for
the bug-fix release -- which alluded to "improving performance on 286
systems."
That sounds pretty scary for us. If they're trying to make it bearable
on a *286*, imagine how it would feel on our humble XT's...
--
... Michael Ho, University of Nebraska
Internet: ho@hoss.unl.edu | "Mine... is the last voice that you will ever hear."
Disclaimer: Peons don't speak for bigwigs.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1991Jan09.190941.28544@hoss.unl.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!hoss!hoss.unl.edu!hoReferences:
<1991Jan9.131031.21220@sbcs.sunysb.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!hoss!hoss.unl.edu!ho From: ho@hoss.unl.edu (Tiny Bubbles...) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: TurboC 2.0 & TurboC++: Speed and Debugger Message-ID: <1991Jan09.190941.28544@hoss.unl.edu> Date: 9 Jan 91 19:09:41 GMT References: <1991Jan9.131031.21220@sbcs.sunysb.edu> Sender: news@hoss.unl.edu (Network News Administer) Distribution: na Organization: Daily Nebraskan, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lines: 20