Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #5456Re: Borland
From: Dave Goldblatt
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1991 09:39
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1991 09:39
49 lines
2691 bytes
2691 bytes
[Sorry for what may seem to be a flame, but this stuff is really
starting to irk me.]
In article <27645@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> jdb@reef.cis.ufl.edu (Brian K. W. Hook) writes:
Is it just me or is Borland royally shafting C developers? I mean, we have
TP for Windows (which INCLUDES Windows classes!), we have TP 6.0 with
ObjectVision, and we have ObjectVision....all include GUI classes. And now
we have BC++, which is highly popular, with NO GUI classes built in. I
feel like we're getting ripped.
Fine. Don't use Borland, then. Buy Microsoft C. But wait! It doesn't
include Windows classes either! In fact, it doesn't even include a C++
compiler!
Borland has said that at some point they may add similar functionality
to Borland C++. If you need them now, go out and buy a commercial
package! There's plenty of them out there! I'd much prefer that
Borland's R&D would be spent on enhancing their language products than
putting out classes which I'd probably end up rewriting anyway.
Then again, maybe I just don't want to code in Pascal and am whining....
This sounds like it's the case. Sorry, but you said it. :-)
Would you be willing to spend another $250 on the Borland C++ compiler if
they included a basic class library? No? Then what's the problem?
How much did you pay for your Borland C++? Did you get it through the
upgrade? Irregardless of that, sit down and figure out how much MS C 6.0
and the SDK would cost you.
"Getting ripped" certainly doesn't qualify.
*sigh*
Yeah. I'm sorry, but I'm really tired of this sort of complaint. If
you need a GUI library, WRITE ONE. Then give it away (a la GNU).
Needless to say, these are MY opinions. You may share them, and if
so, I sympathize. :-)
-dg-
--
"..This kettle is boiling over | Dave Goldblatt [daveg@clearpoint.com]
I think I'm a banana tree.. | Software Engineering (Subsystems)
Oh, dear, I'm going slightly mad.." | Clearpoint Research Corporation
- Queen | 35 Parkwood Dr., Hopkinton, MA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DAVEG.91Mar26093909@flash.clearpoint.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!crackers!davegReferences:
<27645@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!crackers!daveg From: daveg@intruder.clearpoint.com (Dave Goldblatt) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: Borland Message-ID: <DAVEG.91Mar26093909@flash.clearpoint.com> Date: 26 Mar 91 09:39:09 GMT References: <27645@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU> Sender: news@crackers.clearpoint.com Reply-To: daveg@intruder.clearpoint.com Followup-To: /dev/null Organization: Clearpoint Research Corp, Hopkinton MA 01748 Lines: 49 In-reply-to: jdb@reef.cis.ufl.edu's message of 25 Mar 91 20:08:31 GMT