🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <23964@well.sf.ca.us> al@well.sf.ca.us (Alfred Fontes) writes:
>sidney@borland.com (Sidney Markowitz) writes:
>
>>I have established an email address, bugs@borland.com, to which people
>>In most cases, bugs@borland.com will not send confirmation, fixes or
>>workarounds in response to problem reports. 
>
>So why should anyone take the

Let me finish Alfred's post:
				trouble to send stuff there?

Why indeed, Sidney? Can't you guys at minimum acknowledge that you got the
stuff? That you took one of the following actions:
   (1) Ignored it
   (2) Determined it was not a bug but a feature or user error
   (3) Determined it was indeed a bug
It would be nice, of course, if in case (3) you could offer to send a fix
once it is available, but just knowing that something is indeed a bug
is pretty helpful. Since all this can be done by email, it should be fairly
low-cost (or do you expect THOUSANDS of bug reports a day? You COULD
post a list of known bugs and require that anyone submitting a new one first
check the list.)

Cay