Re: Multi-Threaded C

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #5597

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#5597

From: Chet T Laughlin
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 1991 21:26

9 lines
1048 bytes

Xcuse me, but why are you writing your own task handler under OS/2?  Seems
redundant to me when you already have OS support for processes and threads.
Its not like you HAVE to write one, as one would have to under DOS.
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------+
|    Chet Laughlin        chetl@sparc21.tamu.edu      |
|  I have no opinions, my lawyers told me so.  My     |
|  existance is currently under debate.               |
+-----------------------------------------------------+

Technical Details

Message-ID: <14102@helios.TAMU.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!helios!sparc23!chetl

References: <1991Apr2.212636.14024@netcom.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!helios!sparc23!chetl
From: chetl@sparc23.tamu.EDU (Chet T Laughlin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: Multi-Threaded C
Keywords: Turbo C, Multi-threaded C, MS DOS, kludge
Message-ID: <14102@helios.TAMU.EDU>
Date: 3 Apr 91 21:26:46 GMT
References: <1991Apr2.212636.14024@netcom.COM>
Sender: usenet@helios.TAMU.EDU
Reply-To: chetl@sparc23.tamu.EDU (Chet T Laughlin)
Organization: Computer Science Department, Texas A&M University
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message