Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #6647Re: emm386 umb question
From: Jen Kilmer
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 05:50
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 05:50
27 lines
1421 bytes
1421 bytes
In article <1992Nov20.124841.7829@dcs.warwick.ac.uk> nwalczak@dcs.warwick.ac.uk (Nick) writes: >When you use emm386 to load TSR's into upper memory blocks are you making use >of memory that is not otherwise usable by programs such as windows? Or do >umb's form part of extended memory? emm386 creates umbs and emulates ems using xms (extended) memory. So yeah, if you don't need more conventional memory and are using windows a lot, don't bother with umbs. You may not even need to keep the dos=high command, either (which tells ms-dos to load parts of itself, including software code pages if you have them and, if they'll all fit, the disk buffers, into the first 64K of extended memory). >I don't need vast amounts of conventional memory as most of my programs use >extended memory, I am merely interested in making the most memory possible >available to Windows. skip emm386 and dos=high. :> -jen I don't do ms-dos or windows support anywhere officially anymore..... microsoft doesn't speak for me and I don't speak for it. > >-Nick Walczak
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov23.055027.16882@microsoft.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jenkReferences:
<1992Nov20.124841.7829@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jenk From: jenk@microsoft.com (Jen Kilmer) Subject: Re: emm386 umb question Message-ID: <1992Nov23.055027.16882@microsoft.com> Date: 23 Nov 92 05:50:27 GMT Organization: Microsoft Corporation References: <1992Nov20.124841.7829@dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Lines: 29