Re: Programming in 386/486 protected mode

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #670

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#670

From: timlee
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 1992 04:11

16 lines
1091 bytes

joe@proto.com (Joe Huffman) writes:
|crichmon@sedona.intel.com (Chris Richmond) writes:
|
|>PC Week ran an article ( Oct. 14 1991 , page 133 ) on this topic.
|
|>        Intel's          386/486 CodeBuilder 1.0;
|>        MetaWare's       High C 2.31
|>        Symantec's       Zortech C++ 3.0
|>        Watcom's         C/386 8.5
|
|This is getting a bit old.  Watcom has 9.0 out now.  Symantec has another
|release out (still called 3.0 'something' though), too.  I wouldn't be
|surprised if the others do also...

Intel has Code Builder 1.0e (at least) which fixed a bunch of nasty
bugs in 1.0.  MetaWare has High C 2.4 out now.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <6242@public.BTR.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!mips!public!btr.com!timlee

References: <10284@inews.intel.com> <1992Apr10.061620.1080@proto.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!mips!public!btr.com!timlee
From: timlee@public.btr.com
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: Programming in 386/486 protected mode
Message-ID: <6242@public.BTR.COM>
Date: 11 Apr 92 04:11:15 GMT
References: <10284@inews.intel.com> <1992Apr10.061620.1080@proto.com>
Sender: timlee@public.BTR.COM
Reply-To: timlee@btr.com (Timothy J. Lee)
Followup-To: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message