Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #68732bits and BORLAND
From: zcookbruc
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 13:43
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 13:43
19 lines
1361 bytes
1361 bytes
I'm interested in hearing BORLANDs views on this (Am I even in the correct newsgroup?) For a while I've been hearing vague promisses from my local BORLAND office the BORLAND C++ would give me the option for 32bit code. (This implies to me that it would have to support some DOS extender, and behave socially towards other 32bit programs E.G. 386max, QEMM, etc). I've been waiting for the day especially since trying to use TD386, I have to re-configure my system (incidentally loosing memory, and networking) to use the debugger. This isn't a particularly good way to do things when debugging networking programms, or programms that use EMS. I also have the problem of needing to write ADS interface programs for AUTOCAD and would be forced to move to ZORTECH, or HIGH C to do this. Are BORLAND planning to give us a 32bit compiler, and If so which of the many standards will it follow. ...BRU
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Apr12.224356.1@cc.curtin.edu.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!think.com!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!cujo!cc.curtin.edu.au!zcookbrucShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!think.com!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!cujo!cc.curtin.edu.au!zcookbruc From: zcookbruc@cc.curtin.edu.au Subject: 32bits and BORLAND Message-ID: <1992Apr12.224356.1@cc.curtin.edu.au> Lines: 19 Sender: news@cujo.curtin.edu.au (News Manager) Organization: Curtin University of Technology Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1992 13:43:56 GMT