Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #7304Re: byte vs word movs (and TASM BUGS)
From: Robert Collins
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1991 17:19
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1991 17:19
9 lines
1069 bytes
1069 bytes
In article <ysyw42w164w@bluemoon.uucp> andy@bluemoon.uucp (Andy Vaught) writes: >The above is perfectly legal. The problem is convincing MASM of its >legality. You might need an "OFFSET" keyword before "SECTOR". I don't >know, I use Turbo Assembler, which has much more rational syntax. > And TASM has an impossible "bug-set" when dealing with 32-bit (USE32) programming. Sorry, even though MASM has its limitations, unfortunately TASM has even more...which make it unusable in my line of work.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4946@gumby.Altos.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!news.arc.nasa.gov!vsi1!altos!gumby!rcollinsReferences:
<1991Jun21.031758.11264@cs.mcgill.ca> <ysyw42w164w@bluemoon.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!news.arc.nasa.gov!vsi1!altos!gumby!rcollins From: rcollins@gumby.Altos.COM (Robert Collins) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: byte vs word movs (and TASM BUGS) Message-ID: <4946@gumby.Altos.COM> Date: 24 Jun 91 17:19:44 GMT References: <1991Jun21.031758.11264@cs.mcgill.ca> <ysyw42w164w@bluemoon.uucp> Reply-To: rcollins@altos.COM (Robert Collins) Organization: Altos Computer Systems, San Jose, CA Lines: 9