🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1993Jan7.221425.23792@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, fs8j@uvacs.cs.Virginia.EDU (Fraser Street)  wrote:
   >1) Be character based.  
   >2) Do split screens to edit multiple files 
   >3) Have some sort of menu bar for functions which can appear/disappear
   >   as necessary.
   >4) Have some sort of keybindings I am familiar with (emacs or
   >   Wordstar)
   >5) Hopefully have a pop-up help screen for keybindings..
   >
   >2) Syntax directed indenting so that when I program the editor is
   >   aware of the current code and automatically indents to handle (), {},
   >   ;, and other similar constructs.  This would be similar to emacs's
   >   C-mode.
   >3) A relitively robust UNDO facility.
   >
   >
   >The editor DOES NOT need to have:
   >
   >1) A fancy macro language.
   >2) The ability to edit huge files.

Welp, I've used 2 different DOS editors on a regular basis.  I don't recall
seeing a recommended operating system.  But, Bingo3.0 and Qedit 2.1 are both
very good for DOS.  They both accomplish most of the requirements, except
qedit doesn't have a comprehensive mouse feature.  It allows you to move
the cursor with the mouse, but no highlighting.

They both have a C-Mode as well and keybinding setups for multiple editors/
wordprocessors like emacs and wordstar.

Tim.

-------------------------------------------------------
| When the end comes, there will be two men standing: |
|   Me, and the guy I gotta kill.   - Gosh I'm EVIL   |
------ Tim Triemstra ------------- empath@ais.org -----