🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1993Jan11.124451.11804@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>,
davet@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (Dave Tutelman) wrote:
> 
> In article <C0M1Cw.8zv@ireq.hydro.qc.ca> beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca (Denis Beauregard) writes:
> >In article <9301094599@fcshome.UUCP> fredex@fcshome.UUCP (fred smith) writes:
> >>Denis Beauregard (beaurega@ireq.hydro.qc.ca) wrote:
> >>: ... [ attribution lost ] ... wrote:
> >>: >Do you know of a document that presents the grammar of the Fortran
> >>: >language ? I have the compiler, but no documentation, and I don't know
> >>: >what to do...
> >>
> >>: What about buying a legal copy?
> >>
> Gee, and it's just a week since I posted my summary of the cheap/free
> Fortrans for MSDOS in this very newsgroup.  Try an archive site near you
> for BCF7713B.ZIP, a completely freeware FORTRAN (restricted to non-military
> applications).
> 
> My guess is that the original poster is using this Fortran 77, which comes

Thanks Dave, you're right. I've just ftp this package a week ago, and I
feel
really disappointed to found a total lack of documentation on the language
itself...

However, thru this discussion, I've realized that if *is mandatory* to
always
precise that you are not using an illegal copy of a software because
people will believe the opposite :(

I'M USING (Would like to use) BCF7713B.ZIP BUT I NEED DOC ON F77 LANGUAGE !

Paul Rolland

A bug can be changed to a feature by documenting it. Developpers know !