🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #7749

Re: tee for DOS?

#7749
From: Rick Rankin
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:33
46 lines
3019 bytes
In article <1993Jan25.092440.15061@uwasa.fi> ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) writes:

>In article <RICK.93Jan24165959@mel1.geg.mot.com> rick@mel1.geg.mot.com (Rick Rankin) writes:
>>In article <1993Jan22.233913.19275@uwasa.fi> ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) writes:
>>>   In article <C19yB0.AJB@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> stst@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Stefan Strack) writes:
>>>   >In article <1993Jan22.184439.27754@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> esova@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Edward R Sova) writes:
>>>   >>Where can I get the Unix tee command for DOS?  You can split redirection and
>>>
>>>   >TEE (as well as Y) are internal commands of 4DOS, the command.com replacement.
>>>
>>>   An equally useful answer surely is that tee is available for Unix.
>>>   (The 4DOSsers never let up :-).
>>
>>The fact the tee is available for Unix is immaterial.  The man asked
>>for tee for DOS.
>
>Of course it is!  I am confident that you must have understood that
>my Unix reference was meant to emphasize the futility of offering
>4DOS as a solution either.  What an ordinary MsDos user usually
>needs is a command.com compatible answer, not the recurring pitch to
>go for another command interpreter, or another operating system.
>
>My serious answer to the user's original question is browsing
>through the list of Unix-like MsDos commands
>9906 Nov 12 10:57 garbo.uwasa.fi:/pc/unix/0unix.zip
>Another serious answer is the C code that was already given by one
>gentle user.  These are much better answers than implicity
>suggesting changes of configuration.

I apologize if I overreacted.  It seems that so often I see a reply
posted that is esentially useless, i.e., "You want to do _what_ under
DOS?  Why don't you switch to Unix.", or "It's easy to write
yourself.", with nothing more.  (If the poster knew how to write a
short utility, he/she probably wouldn't ask about it.) These are not
generally helpful responses and I'm afraid I saw one more than I could
handle.

--
==============================================================================
| Rick Rankin				|				     |
| Motorola				| Voice: 602-441-5726		     |
| Government Electronics Group		| Fax: 602-441-2919		     |
| 8220 E. Roosevelt St.			| Internet: rick@mel1.geg.mot.com    |
| Scottsdale, AZ 85252			|				     |
| Mail Drop R4246			|				     |
==============================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID: <RICK.93Jan25103346@mel1.geg.mot.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!panther!mothost!schbbs!schbbs!rick
References: <C19yB0.AJB@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> <1993Jan22.233913.19275@uwasa.fi> <RICK.93Jan24165959@mel1.geg.mot.com> <1993Jan25.092440.15061@uwasa.fi>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!panther!mothost!schbbs!schbbs!rick
From: rick@mel1.geg.mot.com (Rick Rankin)
Subject: Re: tee for DOS?
Organization: Motorola, Inc. - Scottsdale, AZ
Date: 25 Jan 93 17:33:46 GMT
Message-ID: <RICK.93Jan25103346@mel1.geg.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: ts@uwasa.fi's message of Mon, 25 Jan 1993 09:24:40 GMT
References: <C19yB0.AJB@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> <1993Jan22.233913.19275@uwasa.fi>
 <RICK.93Jan24165959@mel1.geg.mot.com> <1993Jan25.092440.15061@uwasa.fi>
Sender: news@schbbs.mot.com (Net News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 137.162.1.58
Lines: 46