Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #7749Re: tee for DOS?
From: Rick Rankin
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:33
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:33
46 lines
3019 bytes
3019 bytes
In article <1993Jan25.092440.15061@uwasa.fi> ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) writes: >In article <RICK.93Jan24165959@mel1.geg.mot.com> rick@mel1.geg.mot.com (Rick Rankin) writes: >>In article <1993Jan22.233913.19275@uwasa.fi> ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) writes: >>> In article <C19yB0.AJB@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> stst@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (Stefan Strack) writes: >>> >In article <1993Jan22.184439.27754@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> esova@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Edward R Sova) writes: >>> >>Where can I get the Unix tee command for DOS? You can split redirection and >>> >>> >TEE (as well as Y) are internal commands of 4DOS, the command.com replacement. >>> >>> An equally useful answer surely is that tee is available for Unix. >>> (The 4DOSsers never let up :-). >> >>The fact the tee is available for Unix is immaterial. The man asked >>for tee for DOS. > >Of course it is! I am confident that you must have understood that >my Unix reference was meant to emphasize the futility of offering >4DOS as a solution either. What an ordinary MsDos user usually >needs is a command.com compatible answer, not the recurring pitch to >go for another command interpreter, or another operating system. > >My serious answer to the user's original question is browsing >through the list of Unix-like MsDos commands >9906 Nov 12 10:57 garbo.uwasa.fi:/pc/unix/0unix.zip >Another serious answer is the C code that was already given by one >gentle user. These are much better answers than implicity >suggesting changes of configuration. I apologize if I overreacted. It seems that so often I see a reply posted that is esentially useless, i.e., "You want to do _what_ under DOS? Why don't you switch to Unix.", or "It's easy to write yourself.", with nothing more. (If the poster knew how to write a short utility, he/she probably wouldn't ask about it.) These are not generally helpful responses and I'm afraid I saw one more than I could handle. -- ============================================================================== | Rick Rankin | | | Motorola | Voice: 602-441-5726 | | Government Electronics Group | Fax: 602-441-2919 | | 8220 E. Roosevelt St. | Internet: rick@mel1.geg.mot.com | | Scottsdale, AZ 85252 | | | Mail Drop R4246 | | ==============================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<RICK.93Jan25103346@mel1.geg.mot.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!panther!mothost!schbbs!schbbs!rickReferences:
<C19yB0.AJB@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> <1993Jan22.233913.19275@uwasa.fi> <RICK.93Jan24165959@mel1.geg.mot.com> <1993Jan25.092440.15061@uwasa.fi>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!panther!mothost!schbbs!schbbs!rick From: rick@mel1.geg.mot.com (Rick Rankin) Subject: Re: tee for DOS? Organization: Motorola, Inc. - Scottsdale, AZ Date: 25 Jan 93 17:33:46 GMT Message-ID: <RICK.93Jan25103346@mel1.geg.mot.com> In-Reply-To: ts@uwasa.fi's message of Mon, 25 Jan 1993 09:24:40 GMT References: <C19yB0.AJB@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> <1993Jan22.233913.19275@uwasa.fi> <RICK.93Jan24165959@mel1.geg.mot.com> <1993Jan25.092440.15061@uwasa.fi> Sender: news@schbbs.mot.com (Net News) Nntp-Posting-Host: 137.162.1.58 Lines: 46