Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Article #861Re: a Turbo Debugger 2.0 question (and a query for TD alternatives)
From: Fuzzy Fox
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 17:22
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 17:22
28 lines
1576 bytes
1576 bytes
exuhag@exu.ericsson.se (James Hague) writes: >I also added >the TDH386 driver to my CONFIG file, upping the environment space to a more >than adequate 2048 bytes via the "-e" switch. But still, with over 1 meg of >free XMS memory, TD386 responds with "not enough environment space, use the >-e switch when installing TDH386." Upping it using "-e9999" doesn't help. >What am I doing wrong? The -e switch must specify the same amount of environment space as the /e: line on your SHELL= in CONFIG.SYS. Do they agree on how big the environment is? Also I have found that TDH386 fails when DOS is loaded HIGH (via DOS=HIGH), so don't do that. >BTW, does anyone really use TD and not TD386 or TD286? How many >applications can get by with the speck of free memory left by TD? What was >Borland thinking? I used TD386 when trying to debug UART communication routines. Only TD386 allowed me to single-step through ISR routines (wow!!). -- #ifdef TRUE | Fuzzy Fox fuzzy@netcom.com #define TRUE 0 | a.k.a. David DeSimone an207@cleveland.freenet.edu #define FALSE 1 | #endif | How's my posting? Call 1-800-ALT-FLAME
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug25.172232.3606@rei.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rei2!foxReferences:
<1992Aug24.134245.18447@exu.ericsson.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!rei2!fox From: fox@rei.com (Fuzzy Fox) Subject: Re: a Turbo Debugger 2.0 question (and a query for TD alternatives) Message-ID: <1992Aug25.172232.3606@rei.com> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 17:22:32 GMT References: <1992Aug24.134245.18447@exu.ericsson.se> Organization: Recognition Equipment, Inc. Lines: 28