4DOS diversion (Was Re: A

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #958

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#958

From: Dick Zeitlin
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1992 23:26

18 lines
1198 bytes

TS> .Seriously, because the majority of the PC users are using MsDos.  As
  > .you might recall we already had a ____prolonged____ discussion (a
  > .good one at that) on this subject last spring in this very
  > .newsgroup.

Sorry if this is bringing up an old issue, but I wasn't around last
spring.

I don't understand.  You seem to be implying a dichotomy between 4Dos
and MsDos.  I'm using MsDos, and using the 4Dos shell.  (Is it
anything else but a shell?  Just a replacement for COMMAND.COM, as far
as I know.)  I can't understand why this seems to be put in the same
category as DR-Dos, which is indeed a replacement for MsDos.

        D/

 * OLX 2.2 * Dick.Zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2281.102.uupcb@ssr.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hotmomma!acc1bbs!dick.zeitlin

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!hotmomma!acc1bbs!dick.zeitlin
From: dick.zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Dick Zeitlin) 
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: 4DOS diversion (Was Re: A
Message-ID: <2281.102.uupcb@ssr.com>
Date: 24 Aug 92 23:26:00 GMT
Distribution: world
Organization: Advanced Computer Concepts BBS, New Rochelle, NY 914-654-1981
Reply-To: dick.zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Dick Zeitlin) 
Lines: 18