Re: TASM bug? (no, not at all)

Article View: comp.os.msdos.programmer

Article #2103

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer Previous Next

#2103

From: Woody Suwalski
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 1990 17:46

13 lines
1053 bytes

In article <2953@amc-gw.amc.com> jwbirdsa@europa.amc.com (James Birdsall) writes:
>   There's also MOVZX, an obscure instruction that is available on all 80x86.
>It will extend a byte to a word, zeroing the high byte. I don't know how the
>execution time compares to an XOR/MOV pair, but I suspect it is faster.
>   Unfortunately, the complementary instruction (MOVSX, move with sign
>extend) is only available on the 386.
>

Sorry, my 8086 book never mentioned MOVZX....

It requires at least a 286 processor...

Woody

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4310@chengb>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!spock!suwalski

References: <4691@bdt.UUCP> <38580@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <2953@amc-gw.amc.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!spock!suwalski
From: suwalski@spock (Woody Suwalski)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: TASM bug? (no, not at all)
Message-ID: <4310@chengb>
Date: 6 Sep 90 17:46:59 GMT
References: <4691@bdt.UUCP> <38580@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <2953@amc-gw.amc.com>
Reply-To: suwalski@chengb (Woody Suwalski)
Distribution: na
Organization: Mitel. Kanata (Ontario). Canada.
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message