Article View: comp.os.netware.connectivity
Article #128Re: Should new server be 802.2 or Ethernet II?
From: Matt Haynes
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 00:00
47 lines
2908 bytes
2908 bytes
Tom Kustner wrote: > > We are currently running 802.3 on a NetWare 3.12 server. We are > getting a new server and are thinking of changing frame types. Would > you use 802.2 or Ethernet II on the new server? Assuming that we want > the current server to have the same frame type, are there negative > ramifications of changing its frame type (besides changing NET.CFG > everywhere)? > > I'm confused on another issue. I have seen a number of people say > that frame type 802.2 is required for Packet Burst. Others say that's > an absolute fable. We currently use NETX and we need VLM's to use > packet burst. But does 802.3 support packet burst? Does Ethernet II? > > Thanks for any help. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tom Kustner Emjay Corporation > System/LAN Administrator 725 W. Glendale Ave. > Email: kustner@emjay.com Glendale, WI 53209-6509 USA > Any opinions are mine and not necessarily those of Emjay's. Don't worry about the change from 802.3 to 802.2 The frames are only different in a small way. The 802.2 doesn't have a "TYPE" paramater that tells different parts of the protocol layers what type of data to expect in the packet. Some routers and other high-level (in OSI terms) products like 802.2 as apposed to 802.3. If you are using fddi / ethernet switches some can't use both fddi_802.2 and fddi_802.3 at the same time (for example 3Com Lanplex FDDI switch). Don't dwell on the PBusrst.nlm part of the network. I have seen too many times that pburst just increases LAN errors. Yes you will need to use VLM's to use the pburst, but you can also disable the pburst from vlm by using the PB BUFFERS = 0 in the net.cfg. Try it both ways -with and without the pubust enabled. Look at the lan statistics in Monitor.nlm, and watch for collisions and deffered packets. You may find that the pburst will be slower than with out. Plus you can alway run both frames at the same time in netware. Just load the card driver re-entrantly with both frames, and bind ipx to both cards (one physical card) Hope it helps
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<320ABBD7.1C49@midusa.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<32075b60.4395812@news.execpc.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe659,cdfb6a439be90d1d X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,cdfb6a439be90d1d X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public X-Google-Thread: fa939,cdfb6a439be90d1d X-Google-Attributes: gidfa939,public From: Matt Haynes <mhaynes@midusa.net> Subject: Re: Should new server be 802.2 or Ethernet II? Date: 1996/08/08 Message-ID: <320ABBD7.1C49@midusa.net> X-Deja-AN: 173056427 references: <32075b60.4395812@news.execpc.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: NetSpace Internet Services mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.os.netware.connectivity,bit.listserv.novell,comp.os.netware.misc x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0b5a (WinNT; I)