🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3olvrr$40e@decaxp.harvard.edu>,
Richard Osterberg <osterber@scws40.harvard.edu> wrote:
>My current situation is a ~25 user Netware 3.11 network, running over 
>ARCnet (not ethernet).  The network is also bridged (standard Netware 
>bridge) to a very small ethernet network on a Netware 2.15 server.  
>There's also a very separate Windows for Workgroups network on the floor 
>running on ethernet.

    Sounds like you've got a very similar setup to ours... while I can't
give a lot of answers (I haven't figured it out yet either), I can say
that I've just about decided that ARCnet will have to go. Most everything
I've found is Ethernet only, of course.

>* The connection will initially be very low use... probably dedicated 
>28.8k modem connection.  Is something like that sufficient for running a 
>WWW server on "our" side of the link?  Seems that'd be real slow for 
>people connecting to our WWW site.

    It will be slow for either more than one person accessing your site
at the same time and for people with higher speed links, yes. However,
if your site provides text only and little in the way of graphics,
sound, or just things that take a long time to transfer, it might well
be acceptible.

>* PC/Anywhere, etc.  Is it possible to run PC/Anywhere over an Internet 
>connection?  I.e., we have a host on the network for dial-in remote 
>control sessions.  If the person dialing in has an Internet connection, 
>can that be done over the Internet?

    I never thought about that possibility before! I'm not sure how it
would, but what do I know...?

- Mark G.