Article View: comp.os.netware.misc
Article #151Re: Virus checkers
From: gstreet
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 00:00
30 lines
1726 bytes
1726 bytes
On Sun, 08 Dec 1996 13:49:17 +0000, Anthony Cotton <A.P.Cotton@derby.ac.uk> wrote: >Hi, > >We used to use Central Point Anti Virus on about 20 of our netware >servers (3+4). The NLM was used to protect the server and a DOS based >program was used at login to check the PC. Since CP was brought by >Symantec, the service and support was non existent. > >Now that CPAV now longer exists, what's the best AV product for us. We >don't want to use ANY Symantec product! > >Anthony Cotton >Network Support >University of Derby >mailto:A.P.Cotton@derby.ac.uk Well my first choice is Norton (by Symantec) because it is one of the best virus scanners you can get, but we also have installed Innoculan by Cheynne. The good thing about Innoculan is it works with their Arcserve product. If you have a modem attached to the server it will retrieve it's own updates with no intervention. Innoculan claims to find 100% of all known viri. The decision between NLM based and workstation based is usually dependant on cost. If you have to buy licenses for 25 workstations the NLM version is less expensive. For a 5 or 10 workstation lan you may want to just buy a exe ver for each ws.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32ab96d5.96634974@news.alt.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<32AAC75D.5C2F@derby.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe659,b6a6f8f5ba643ee9 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,b6a6f8f5ba643ee9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public From: gstreet@ccm.tdsnet.com Subject: Re: Virus checkers Date: 1996/12/09 Message-ID: <32ab96d5.96634974@news.alt.net> X-Deja-AN: 203079758 references: <32AAC75D.5C2F@derby.ac.uk> organization: Altopia Corp. - Affordable Usenet Access - http://www.alt.net newsgroups: comp.os.netware.misc,bit.listserv.novell