🚀 go-pugleaf

Ohh poor people.

I remember when VAX-clusters got available. (You did'nt have
a cluster to increase relability 'cause those vax'es never crached).

Clusters could consist of *ANY* vaxes, the only thing
was that VMS releases was recommended to be one or two steps
apart.

And clusters consisted of *any* vaxes. And they worked. And this
happened (for me) at 1986 . Some clusters are still alive since
then, the cluster never dies, but the members are all exchanged.

So i have one (nasty) question:
Why should i consider novell sft when they seems to
be more then 10 years behind ??? 



Marc Knecht (marc.knecht@hitline.ch) wrote:
: hjrm@mail.telepac.pt (Henrique Martins) wrote:

: >Hi everyone.

: >I would like to here how important is to have similar mirror servers
: >for Novell 3.12 SFT III and 4.0 SFT III.

: >I think that if we have equal machines it is not so safe because it
: >oftem happens that if a board has a problem, many others, of the same
: >batch, may well have the same problem.

: >On the other side, of couse, on there is no problem in one maybe there
: >is no batch problem and both will be OK.

: >This apply to any peace of hardware, including disks.

: >If mirror servers are different we will have more chances of having
: >one problem but, maybe, not the same one in the other machine. But
: >them how confused will SFT III be ?

: >Please send your comments.
: >Thank you

: It's very important, the servers have been equal 150%.
: we had eproblems with SFTIII cause the BIOS of the Compaq DISKS was
: not equal!!!!




--
--
Peter Hakanson  VolvoData Dep 2580 phone +46 31 66 74 27