Article View: comp.os.netware.misc
Article #386Re: RAID 5 vs duplexing
From: Roger Kresge
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 1996 00:00
43 lines
2652 bytes
2652 bytes
kcordes@mo.net (Kyle Cordes) wrote: >In article <4olb39$9i1@lily.redrose.net>, rkresge@web.iis-centpa.com wrote: >>Hmmmmmm.... I've seen a few otherwise knowledgeable system engineers >>(even a CNE who *should* have known better) install a new drive and >>mirror the good drive to the empty new one. Kind of hard on the data, >>doing that. Suppose that's what might have caused the good drive to >>get "corrupted"? >Just in case I ever have a mirrored drive fail... >What IS the proper procedure for restoring operations? The proper way is to make sure you know which drive is which before you start mirroring. The long numbers you see in INSTALL actually tell you which drive is which; you can also blink the drive activity light on *some* drives (this requires controller support) manually, in order to identify which drive is which. One easy way to handle this is to carefully note which drive has NetWare partitions and which doesn't, before you add the necessary partition. Then you'll have the NetWare ID of the new drive before starting the mirror process. >And why isn't Netware smart enough to realize that if you have a drive full of >data that used to be mirrored, and got unmirrored due to drive failure, and >now has an empty drive mirrored to it, you probably intend to replace the >failed drive with the one you just plugged in. It's a little hard to do that, since mirroring is done at the partition level. Data doesn't happen until after you've created volumes on the partitions. Nothing beats a little experience and knowledge (read that as a combination of advance preparation, study, and hands-on experience). -- =================================================================== Roger Kresge, Master CNE/CNI Internet: rkresge@web.iis-centpa.com Inacom Information Systems Compuserve: 71023,447 Lancaster, PA ===================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4or2uj$aa@lily.redrose.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31938d64.16703900@news.execpc.com> <4o22hp$5pr@clarknet.clark.net> <31A95E52.4063@dpie.gov.au> <4of367$rfp@clarknet.cla <4oms6f$21m@Twain.MO.NET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe659,6b2e5f577816a3a4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,6b2e5f577816a3a4 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public From: rkresge@web.iis-centpa.com (Roger Kresge) Subject: Re: RAID 5 vs duplexing Date: 1996/06/02 Message-ID: <4or2uj$aa@lily.redrose.net> X-Deja-AN: 158000274 references: <31938d64.16703900@news.execpc.com> <4o22hp$5pr@clarknet.clark.net> <31A95E52.4063@dpie.gov.au> <4of367$rfp@clarknet.cla <4oms6f$21m@Twain.MO.NET> organization: a Digital Internet AlphaServer Site reply-to: rkresge@web.iis-centpa.com newsgroups: comp.os.netware.misc,bit.listserv.novell