Article View: comp.os.netware.misc
Article #802Re: Monitor network utilization?
From: m.sato
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00
48 lines
2905 bytes
2905 bytes
tbenson@dzs.com wrote: > I have a small Netware 411 10BASE-T network that is growing (1 server, CAT >5, 4 hubs, 24 users). I'll soon have another 10 nodes. Are there statistics >in the LAN/WAN section of MONITOR that I can use to see how much bandwidth is >being used? How about a freeware/demo/shareware utility? I'll pay for >"regular" software if I have to, but can't spend much. If I had some network >monitoring software it would help me decide what new hardware I'll need. I went from two 10Mbps segments (4 hubs daisy-chained on each NIC to a tune of 50 users) to a switch that has one 100Mbps segment to the file server & 10Mbps to the workstations. I just dropped the eight 10 Mbps hubs I had each from the switch port; the switch I got came with 24 10/100Mbps auto-sensing ports so I used eight of those ports for the hubs & one for the server & I still have 15 ports open on the switch where I can either hang hubs or connect a power hungry user direct to the port @ 10Mbps or 100Mbps. I think what I heard from the gurus was in a single server environment with the same pipe width all around one won't see a difference (or even a worse performance like Dave has suggested) but if the pipe to the server is bigger than pipe to the workstations & the box can handle the requests (I upgraded my CPU from 486/66 to PPro200; also from NW312 to NW411) then it should be at least the same as or better performance. For me the performance was not a concern even before the switch but the introduction of a switch had the added benefits like no need for subnetting IP, easier to expand (instead of adding segments each time I hit the 4 hub daisy-chain limit I can just hang another hub from a switch port), etc. Also, go look @ www.wg.com; there's a demo of their s/w called "LinkView" ... I tried that & it was neat. Although it is crippled in the sense that it's limited to collecting packets for only 5 minutes & is limited to only 5 workstations I had fun playing w/it. HTH. Robert > >Thanks for any suggestions, > Tom Benson > >-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- >http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3589a39c.164862242@news.csuohio.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<6m9gc1$r7j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1128fd,7af1e391b667dbad X-Google-Attributes: gid1128fd,public X-Google-Thread: 1029a0,7af1e391b667dbad X-Google-Attributes: gid1029a0,public X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,7af1e391b667dbad X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public From: m.sato@popmail.csuohio.edu Subject: Re: Monitor network utilization? Date: 1998/06/18 Message-ID: <3589a39c.164862242@news.csuohio.edu> X-Deja-AN: 364021497 References: <6m9gc1$r7j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Organization: Cleveland State University Newsgroups: comp.os.netware.misc,comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,intel.networking_and_communications.network_adapters_and_hubs