🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.netware.misc
Article #802

Re: Monitor network utilization?

#802
From: m.sato
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:00
48 lines
2905 bytes
tbenson@dzs.com wrote:

>  I have a small Netware 411 10BASE-T network that is growing (1 server, CAT
>5, 4 hubs, 24 users).  I'll soon have another 10 nodes.  Are there statistics
>in the LAN/WAN section of MONITOR that I can use to see how much bandwidth is
>being used?  How about a freeware/demo/shareware utility?  I'll pay for
>"regular" software if I have to, but can't spend much.	If I had some network
>monitoring software it would help me decide what new hardware I'll need.

I went from two 10Mbps segments (4 hubs daisy-chained on each NIC to a
tune of 50 users) to a switch that has one 100Mbps segment to the file
server & 10Mbps to the workstations. I just dropped the eight 10 Mbps
hubs I had each from the switch port; the switch I got came with 24
10/100Mbps auto-sensing ports so I used eight of those ports for the
hubs & one for the server & I still have 15 ports open on the switch
where I can either hang hubs or connect a power hungry user direct to
the port @ 10Mbps or 100Mbps.

I think what I heard from the gurus was in a single server environment
with the same pipe width all around one won't see a difference (or
even a worse performance like Dave has suggested) but if the pipe to
the server is bigger than pipe to the workstations & the box can
handle the requests (I upgraded my CPU from 486/66 to PPro200; also
from NW312 to NW411) then it should be at least the same as or better
performance.

For me the performance was not a concern even before the switch but
the introduction of a switch had the added benefits like no need for
subnetting IP, easier to expand (instead of adding segments each time
I hit the 4 hub daisy-chain limit I can just hang another hub from a
switch port), etc.

Also, go look @ www.wg.com; there's a demo of their s/w called
"LinkView" ... I tried that & it was neat. Although it is crippled in
the sense that it's limited to collecting packets for only 5 minutes &
is limited to only 5 workstations I had fun playing w/it. 

HTH. Robert



>
>Thanks for any suggestions,
> Tom Benson
>
>-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
>http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3589a39c.164862242@news.csuohio.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <6m9gc1$r7j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1128fd,7af1e391b667dbad
X-Google-Attributes: gid1128fd,public
X-Google-Thread: 1029a0,7af1e391b667dbad
X-Google-Attributes: gid1029a0,public
X-Google-Thread: f8bf7,7af1e391b667dbad
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8bf7,public
From: m.sato@popmail.csuohio.edu
Subject: Re: Monitor network utilization?
Date: 1998/06/18
Message-ID: <3589a39c.164862242@news.csuohio.edu>
X-Deja-AN: 364021497
References: <6m9gc1$r7j$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Organization: Cleveland State University
Newsgroups: comp.os.netware.misc,comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,intel.networking_and_communications.network_adapters_and_hubs