Article View: comp.os.os2.apps
Article #4182Re: FAT vs. HPFS ...
From: Dave Jackson
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 08:02
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 08:02
102 lines
3632 bytes
3632 bytes
In article <LUBKT.93Jan11153837@synergy.CC.Lehigh.EDU>, lubkt@synergy.CC.Lehigh.EDU (Binod Taterway) writes: |> |> Fellow OS/2 users, |> |> I want to create OS/2 programs and folders on a 1.44M |> floppy diskette. |> I formatted the diskette from an OS/2 Window and created a |> folder by |> dragging the Folder template to Drive A icon. The folder |> was properly |> created. Then I wanted to copy an OS/2 program to this |> folder in the A |> drive. That didn't work. |> |> I recalled that there are two types of file systems: HPFS |> and FAT. I |> changed the IFS line to read |> |> IFS=C:\OS2\HPFS.IFS /CACHE:64 /CRECL:4 Change it back again, all you are doing is wasting around 500K of RAM if you aren't using HPFS (and you're not, see below) |> |> and rebooted the system. I reformatted the floppy and |> tried again. I |> still get the same problem. When I did the format, I was |> told that the |> file system on the floppy is FAT. Could this be the |> problem? No, this message is normal, it isn't why the copy didn't work. |> Do I need to use HPFS on the floppy? Floppies can't be formatted to HPFS. |> I am not sure how. I also loaded FDISKPM to |> see what kind of partition is the C drive. It is FAT. Why |> is FAT? I |> have a PS/ValuePoint preinstalled OS/2 2.0. I didn't do |> anything to |> make it FAT. IBM preformatted the drive as FAT, this makes it more compatible with the DOS and Windows programs you're undoubtably going to install on the drive (For example Norton Desktop For Windows needs some ini file editing before it works on an HPFS partition, there are no problems with FAT (okay, backup and disk doctor won't work with OS/2, but this is OS and not filesystem dependent)). |> Is there anyway I can use HPFS? Yes, you can reformat the drive as HPFS, but not until you have a set of operating system diskettes so as to be able to reinstall OS/2. It really isn't worth the effort of doing this until more applications are HPFS aware. To most people the main benefit of HPFS is being able to use long file names, however any DOS application won't "see" any file which doesn't conform to the 8.3 filespec, so by giving you FAT IBM have made sure you won't create files which your DOS programs won't see, and hence can't use. |> If so, would I be able to use DOS programs? Yes, but see above. |> Too many questions, I know. |> Answer whatever you |> can. |> -- I think that what you are trying to do is to copy an object, and not a file, to your A: drive. To copy files open the "Drives" object, you should be able to drag files from this to your A: object (The A: object on your desktop is just a shadow of one of your 'drives' anyway). If this doesn't work try copy from an OS/2 command line. E_Mail me if you need any more than this. Hope this helps, David J Jackson Telephone +44 473 645805 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ djackson@axion.bt.co.uk TO LET: Blank line - would suit witty signature ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan12.080218@axion.bt.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!axion!djacksonReferences:
<LUBKT.93Jan11153837@synergy.CC.Lehigh.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!axion!djackson From: djackson@axion.bt.co.uk (Dave Jackson) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps Subject: Re: FAT vs. HPFS ... Message-ID: <1993Jan12.080218@axion.bt.co.uk> Date: 12 Jan 93 08:02:18 GMT References: <LUBKT.93Jan11153837@synergy.CC.Lehigh.EDU> Sender: news@axion.bt.co.uk Reply-To: djackson@axion.bt.co.uk (Dave Jackson) Distribution: comp.os.os2.misc Organization: British Telecom Research Labs Lines: 102