🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.apps
Article #4524

Re: Difference between WebEx1.1d & 1.03

#4524
From: bashton
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 00:00
48 lines
3108 bytes
In <4tbb7p$bf8@solaris.cc.vt.edu>, chcrawfo@vt.edu writes:
>In <4t67k4$p0d@news.mel.aone.net.au>, hugh@s055.aone.net.au  [Hugh Blandford] writes:
>>Does anyone know where I can find out the difference between these two versions?
>>
>>Has anyone had any problems running 1.1d.  After making a few changes to my
>>system (installing 1.1d was one) I started getting the death screen:
>>
>>the one that starts with TRAP in the top left hand corner!!
>>
>>Any comments welcome,
>>
>>Hugh.
>
>Hugh,
>
>I recently had problems with the WebEx 1.03 not being able to show some
>graphic images...  It turns out, that the major visable diference between 1.03
>and 1.1d is that 1.1d includes a lot more Netscape compatable options such as 
>frames (which was the cause of my not being able to view some pictures).
>
>As far as I know, your problems stem from something other than WebEx.  Before
>you do anything else, why don't you delete any WebEx files you might have in all 
>directories (this doesn't include url's and html files)
>
>Then, reinstall WebEx and see if that helps.
>
>Charles Crawford
>chcrawfo@vt.edu

Hugh,

I'll put in my two cents worth on 1.1d!  I started out with 1.03, played around with it, learned its quirks, etc.  I DID notice that 1.03 made HUGE swap files for no apparent reason.  The more documents brought in, the worst it got.

From there I went to 1.1b and IMMEDIATELY went back to 1.03.  Why?  Something with how it handled graphics that got re-routed on their way in... made them blurry and imcomplete.  Very annoying.  Swap file still got huge even though one of the READMEs said it was supposed to be fixed.

Finally, I'm on to 1.1d.  Much better reliability.  No crashes yet.  Better frame support as mentioned.  And I don't care what they say about the swap file supposed to be fixed, it STILL grows huge.

At least it's stable now.  For fear of being shot for treason in an OS/2 group, it's a *good* browser.  Wish it would do the stuff that W****** browsers would do.  But, I'll give away a few points here and there to have a stable operating system.  Smile.

One oddity I've noticed:  If you use LINKUP.EXE to launch WE (to start dialer automatically), all the files in the \TCPIP\ETC directory stay there when WE is shut down.

Take LINKUP.EXE out, and WE dutifully erases them.  Go figure.  Make sure LINKUP.EXE is out as you'll clutter the heck out of your hard drive and wonder why you're losing all that space!

So what... you got 50 cents worth.


Brent
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4tmq7m$qum@duey.gte.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4t67k4$p0d@news.mel.aone.net.au> <4tbb7p$bf8@solaris.cc.vt.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10a752,e0ad18bd4206a421
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a752,public
X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,e0ad18bd4206a421
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public
From: bashton@gte.net
Subject: Re: Difference between WebEx1.1d & 1.03
Date: 1996/07/31
Message-ID: <4tmq7m$qum@duey.gte.net>
X-Deja-AN: 171219748
references: <4t67k4$p0d@news.mel.aone.net.au> <4tbb7p$bf8@solaris.cc.vt.edu>
organization: GTE Intelligent Network Services, GTE INS
reply-to: bashton@gte.net
newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,aus.computers.os2