🚀 go-pugleaf

Lines: 30

In article <5idnui$65h@client2.news.psi.net>,
os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57) wrote:
>
>Seeing the problem and accepting it is the first step to find a
>solution.  I have no way about grabbing IBM by the ear to lead to
>solutions.  I am doing my part in identifying and brining out the
>problems.  OS/2 is not my product....the platform I still use.

OK, why?  Why use it at all?  You have made various claims, most in this
particular thread, relating to the instability of the platform, the 
out-dated Toolkit, the quality of IBM's drivers on their own brand of 
equipment, the quality of the file system, and yet, you still program 
for it, are attending seminars about DB/2 and still hang around in an 
OS/2 applications newsgroup.  I don't get it.

While I haven't met an operating system that did not have _some_ "fault"
I did not like about it, I have dropped products for far less than most 
of the things you complain about.  In fact, I would even update my 
resume and find something else, if it were an integral part of my job 
and I felt the way you come across as feeling about it.

John

-- 
//------------------------------------------------------------------------
// momerath@apk.net                    sevot yhtils eht dna ,gillirb sawT`
// MarchHare@momeraths.org                 ebaw eht ni elbmig dna eryg diD
//                                           ,sevogorob eht erew ysmim llA
//                                            .ebargtuo shtar emom eht dnA
                     In case of stupidity, break glass.