Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk.

Article View: comp.os.os2.apps

Article #4648

#4648

From: .
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 00:00

12 lines
1130 bytes

On 30 Mar 1997 16:58:55 GMT, os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal
MS57) wrote:

>>Why not compare it to NT 4.0?  Because you know it is not as stable as 
>>3.51.  At least have the courtesy to compare apples to apples.
>
>;) You would have to compare it to Warp 4.0....I am comparing it to
>Warp3.0, and even Warp Connect 3.0

Thats why Warp 4.0 is better than Warp 3.0 (on my notebook more
stable, too) and NT 4.0 is a bit more crap than NT 3.51 was.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <334379b7.5566923@news.axion.bt.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu> <zEVPz0E6A5GN092yn@momeraths.org> <5hm64f$n0f@client2.news.psi.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public
X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,cc256aafa6f1bcba
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
From: .
Subject: Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk.
Date: 1997/04/02
Message-ID: <334379b7.5566923@news.axion.bt.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 230009109
References: <5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu> <zEVPz0E6A5GN092yn@momeraths.org> <5hm64f$n0f@client2.news.psi.net>
Organization: BT Labs, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich, UK
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l

Reply to Parent Message