🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <lqWPz0E6Ah5c092yn@momeraths.org>,
Sysop <MarchHare@momeraths.org> wrote:
> <5gpddf$4ns@client2.news.psi.net>
>Lines: 42
>
>In article <5gpddf$4ns@client2.news.psi.net>,
>os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57) wrote:
>>
>>;) Tell us where to buy it <G>.....There is no seperate developer's
>>toolkit available these days, it comes with the compiler.  Besides, that
>>linker has problems, and each time I get a new compiler package, I have
>>to replace the linker with the one in the compiler package.  If the
>>paths get mixed up, you'll end up using the wrong linker...
>
>Ironic how you like to call everyone else a liar, but cannot tell the 
>truth yourself.  Even more ironic is the fact that I just installed the 
>latest toolkit a few days ago after resubscribing to DevCon.  It 

Ironic is that it came with the DevCon beta pile, amybe even as a beta
version, and was not available to purchase as a product toolkit of its
own.  Who is lying?

>definitely did not come with my compiler, Watcom 10.0b.  Maybe I'll 

Watcom isn't the IBM compiler.  The IBM compiler is VAC++.  Besides, I
thought Watcom stopped developing for OS/2.

>upgrade my copy of Watcom some day, if they ever get their act together 
>enough to make me care.  Funny, though, how they at least had enough 
>common sense to call their linker "wlink" and getting around the problem
>you just described.  Better yet, I can still use emx whenever the mood 
>strikes me.
>
>>Online where?  Internet or Warp4 installation?
>
>If you had subscribed to DevCon, you'd know the answer.  Of course, you 

If I paid a few hundred bucks for a pile of garbage....Besides, I didn't
ask the question, I was anwering someones question.  Comprehend...

>probably only would want to put out the money if you are a serious 
>developer.  I take that back, I'm not a "professional" programmer, and I

;) So, it is irrelevant.  I paid for it several years and decided that it
was of no use.

>paid for it.  Then again, I did let the subscription lapse for a few 
>months.  After all, do I really need to update it _every_ quarter?  I 
>suppose I would if I were getting paid for it.  However, I still find it

Good point.  It doesn't pay off since it is full of beta's.

>a worthwhile investment.  I'm even getting into PM programming now, and 
>I'll probably have my first freeware PM program out in a couple of 
>months.

;) I'll laught at you when you get the bug reports that don't happen on
your machine and when IBM asks you to pay $200 to talk to you.  :)  You
are asking for trouble, and you will probably get it too.

>
>Of course, you could have just read his post and you could have answered
>your own question.

Yeah right.

>
>John
>-- 
>//------------------------------------------------------------------------
>// momerath@apk.net                    sevot yhtils eht dna ,gillirb sawT`
>// MarchHare@momeraths.org                 ebaw eht ni elbmig dna eryg diD
>//                                           ,sevogorob eht erew ysmim llA
>//                                            .ebargtuo shtar emom eht dnA
>                     In case of stupidity, break glass.


Best Regards,

Mustafa Soysal

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mustafa Soysal               (313) 741-1844 Voice                      TeamOS/2
MISTIK Systems               (313) 741-1937 Fax          Author of UnTieCom(tm)
PO Box 7064                                        Authorized Motorola Reseller
Ann Arbor, MI 48107-7064, USA                            os2@mistik.express.net
               Online catalog:  http://www.express.net/mistik/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------