Article View: comp.os.os2.apps
Article #4688Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk.
From: Mustafa Soysal MS57
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 00:00
46 lines
2921 bytes
2921 bytes
In article <Nk8NzgRDAMcC091yn@bigblue.no>, B. Vermo <bv@bigblue.no> wrote:
>In article <5h7kkq$69s@client3.news.psi.net>,
>os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57) wrote:
>|
>|You would have an axe to gring with IBM if they weren't able to bring
>|out a stable version that can run more than 24 hours stable (that's the
>|most stable it got, after dooming the system to do pretty much nothing
>
>It must be something you (or your hardware) are doing. I have always
>been running on a 365 day 24 hour basis. All serious problems up to
>now have been traced to hardware or experimental software. Warp 4 is
>not as stable as OS/2 1.3, but then nothing else on the Intel platform
Linux is, and apparently reportedly on os2-l, NT 3.1 is...
>is either. I do an unattended reboot every Sunday night to clean up
Unattended reboots would be a problem since OS/2 isn't stable. If the
WPS starts crashing and rebooting over and over, and ends up connecting
and disconnecting to the ISP, that would cost a fortune.
However, weekly manual restarts would be acceptable, even for ISP use,
if OS/2 was that stable. But it is not. And I cannot be locked in a
certain selection of hardware, especially if it is not known at any time
until you tried it since I may need to upgrade for performance reasons.
>after any rogue applications. This only takes 20 minutes, and is a
>sound practice which I also followed with minicomputers.
>
I wish it was that stable, and I didn't have to write what I write for
that reason.
Best Regards,
Mustafa Soysal
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mustafa Soysal (313) 741-1844 Voice TeamOS/2
MISTIK Systems (313) 741-1937 Fax Author of UnTieCom(tm)
PO Box 7064 Authorized Motorola Reseller
Ann Arbor, MI 48107-7064, USA os2@mistik.express.net
Online catalog: http://www.express.net/mistik/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5hc5mg$p0o@client3.news.psi.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu> <c0.9w.2FVPFB$02w@picard.cds-inc.com> <5h7kkq$69s@client3.news.psi.net> <Nk8NzgRDAMcC091yn@bigblue.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18 X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,cc256aafa6f1bcba X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public From: os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57) Subject: Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk. Date: 1997/03/26 Message-ID: <5hc5mg$p0o@client3.news.psi.net> X-Deja-AN: 228583136 Distribution: world References: <5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu> <c0.9w.2FVPFB$02w@picard.cds-inc.com> <5h7kkq$69s@client3.news.psi.net> <Nk8NzgRDAMcC091yn@bigblue.no> Organization: MISTIK Systems (info@express.net for account info) (313) 741-1844 Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l