Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk.

Article View: comp.os.os2.apps

Article #4697

#4697

From: B. Vermo
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 00:00

15 lines
1405 bytes

In article <5h7kkq$69s@client3.news.psi.net>,
os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57) wrote:
|
|You would have an axe to gring with IBM if they weren't able to bring
|out a stable version that can run more than 24 hours stable (that's the
|most stable it got, after dooming the system to do pretty much nothing

It must be something you (or your hardware) are doing. I have always
been running on a 365 day 24 hour basis. All serious problems up to
now have been traced to hardware or experimental software. Warp 4 is
not as stable as OS/2 1.3, but then nothing else on the Intel platform
is either. I do an unattended reboot every Sunday night to clean up
after any rogue applications. This only takes 20 minutes, and is a
sound practice which I also followed with minicomputers.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Nk8NzgRDAMcC091yn@bigblue.no>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,cc256aafa6f1bcba
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public
From: bv@bigblue.no (B. Vermo)
Subject: Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk.
Date: 1997/03/25
Message-ID: <Nk8NzgRDAMcC091yn@bigblue.no>
X-Deja-AN: 228390960
Distribution: world
References: <5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu>
Organization: Norbionics
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l

Reply to Parent Message