Article View: comp.os.os2.apps
Article #4707Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk.
From: polyex
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 00:00
42 lines
3020 bytes
3020 bytes
In <c0.9w.2FVPFB$02w@picard.cds-inc.com>, benson@cds-inc.com writes:
>In <5h1uga$7li@client2.news.psi.net>, os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57) writes:
>>>Why should you be surprised? That is exactly the market that IBM has been
>>>saying they are pursuing with OS/2. ISV's who write software for that kind
>>
>>That's a lie. IBM has not been saying from 2.0 on that they were
>>pursuing only the banks and insurances. On the contrary, they were
>>saying they were targeting small businesses for their mission critical
>>computing needs.
>
>I think your language is a little strong. OS/2 has always been targeted mainly
>towards the fortune 500-type organizations. Sure, they toyed with the
>small office/home office market as well as the consumer market, but OS/2
>came from an organization that has always been devoted to developing
>products for the big corporate market. Small businesses have little use
>for things like Communications Manager/2, or CICS/2, for example. The
>SOHO/consumer efforts have always been a lower priority, looking at the
>history of OS/2.
>
>I'm sorry your fax/data utility failed, but you can't blame the lack of demand for
>such a niche product on OS/2 as you have done in previous posts - I'd be surprised
>if you sold many more copies of such a thing on any platform. You obviously
>have an axe to grind with OS/2, and seem to go out of your way
>to disparage it (and OS/2 users, on occasion), for some unknown reason. Is
>the Win32 market larger? Yes. Is OS/2 dead? No. Is OS/2 dying? No. If
>you want to say that no one can succeed by writing software for OS/2, I'm
>one of many examples that will prove you wrong.
>
>Cheers,
>Brad
All I have to say to that is "Let the Games Begin!"
================================================================================
Adam Hall
PolyEx Software
Makers of the Wordup Graphics Toolkit for OS/2
Come check out our code at http://www.netsrq.com/~polyex
"Remember when we first landed on this planet? It was a really beautiful garden"
-Baron (Rainbow Bridge- Maui 07/1970 AD)
================================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3336d3ef.0@news.intnet.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu> <5h02m5$a16@saltspring.teleserve.ca> <5h0p7l$3os@client3.news.psi.net> <c0.9w.2FTgWs$02u@picard.cds-inc.com> <5h1uga$7li@client2.news.psi.net> <c0.9w.2FVPFB$02w@picard.cds-inc.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18 X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,cc256aafa6f1bcba X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public From: polyex@mail.netsrq.com Subject: Re: All this OS/2 is dead talk. Date: 1997/03/24 Message-ID: <3336d3ef.0@news.intnet.net> X-Deja-AN: 228029345 References: <5gh5h2$rqk@no-names.nerdc.ufl.edu> <5h02m5$a16@saltspring.teleserve.ca> <5h0p7l$3os@client3.news.psi.net> <c0.9w.2FTgWs$02u@picard.cds-inc.com> <5h1uga$7li@client2.news.psi.net> <c0.9w.2FVPFB$02w@picard.cds-inc.com> Reply-To: polyex@mail.netsrq.com Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l