Re: OS/2 dead? Uh, no. read this.

Article View: comp.os.os2.apps

Article #4765

#4765

From: .
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 00:00

9 lines
1103 bytes

On Fri, 14 Mar 1997 12:37:35 -0800, mperry@basin.com (Michael Perry)
wrote:

>> >As it is, there are still no really
>> >effective office suites for OS/2, tho' you can hack together
>> >substitutes; and I suspect that's a large part of why OS/2 is dead

You ever tried StarOffice ? (www.stardivision.de I think)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <33331037.20392004@news.axion.bt.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <MPG.d8faecc857425e6989695@news.znet.com> <5g6td4$oeu@shelby.visix.com> <5g93c3$1u2$2@ordeal.cts.com> <5gc3dg$lu4@client2.news.psi.net> <MPG.d9356eb8c00415d9896a3@news.znet.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public
X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,cc256aafa6f1bcba
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
From: .
Subject: Re: OS/2 dead?  Uh, no.  read this.
Date: 1997/03/21
Message-ID: <33331037.20392004@news.axion.bt.co.uk>
X-Deja-AN: 227277900
References: <5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <MPG.d8faecc857425e6989695@news.znet.com> <5g6td4$oeu@shelby.visix.com> <5g93c3$1u2$2@ordeal.cts.com> <5gc3dg$lu4@client2.news.psi.net> <MPG.d9356eb8c00415d9896a3@news.znet.com>
Organization: BT Labs, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich, UK
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l

Reply to Parent Message