Re: OS/2 dead? Uh, no. read this.

Article View: comp.os.os2.apps

Article #4808

#4808

From: James Knott
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 00:00

12 lines
990 bytes

In article <MPG.d9356eb8c00415d9896a3@news.znet.com>,
mperry@basin.com (Michael Perry) wrote:

>> UnTieCom(tm) got about 200 customers at most, a lot of them not regisreted. 
>> I haven't compiled the exact numbers.

I am one of those who registered and paid for my copy of UnTieCom, which I 
found quite useful.  However, the current version of Faxworks makes it surplus
to my needs.

Thanks for a useful utility.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <N3BLzsbnbhXE089yn@ibm.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,7905b5083192d203
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public
From: jamesk@ibm.net (James Knott)
Subject: Re: OS/2 dead? Uh, no. read this.
Date: 1997/03/16
Message-ID: <N3BLzsbnbhXE089yn@ibm.net>
X-Deja-AN: 225980158
References: <5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l

Reply to Parent Message