🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.apps
Article #4816

Re: OS/2 dead? Uh, no. read this.

#4816
From: Mustafa Soysal MS57
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 00:00
63 lines
3432 bytes
In article <RwiKzoHpvKzM092yn@skypoint.com>,
Richard Steiner <rsteiner@skypoint.com> wrote:
>Here in comp.os.os2.misc, os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57)
>spake unto us, saying:
>
>>UnTieCom(tm) got about 200 customers at most, a lot of them not regisreted. 
>>I haven't compiled the exact numbers.
>
>What's UnTieCom?  I've never heard of it, and I play around a lot with
>various utilities...  Then again, I registered SIO in 1993, so I don't
>look a lot at communications-related things.
>
>>Describe went under, and I hear Stardock is complaining....
>
>DeScribe, Inc. was managed in an "interesting" way, and they made a few
>very bad moves in the past which ended up alienating significant segments
>of their potential market (I avoided their word processor for almost two
>years before I decided to buy it because of one of their proposed schemes
>that they abandoned at the last minute before release).

Well, the worst mistake was the crashing demo version initialy put out. 
After that I didn't reconsider since I kept hearing crash reports with
the real product.

>
>>Let's move on to Windows as our finances permit.
>
>Heh.  I use Windows 95 a little here (I had little choice in obtaining
>it, since it came with my new machine), and it's not a good replacement
>for Warp 4 for me, which is why I consider my Windows 95 setup more of
>a plaything and spend 95% of my time in Warp.

Well, I can go WIndows 3.1 without having to switch until I have
everthing I need.  That's the main reason...Otherwise I would go Windows
NT or linux.

>
>Win95 is decent enough (*certainly* better than Win 3.1), and may have
>some application advantages, but it's FAR too limited as an environment
>in a number of areas that I'm used to.  I think *it* really needs a 32-
>bit command line, you know?
>
>-- 
>-Rich Steiner  >>>--->  rsteiner@skypoint.com  >>>---> Bloomington, MN
>      Written offline using PC Yarn + Yep + FTE under OS/2 Warp 4
>                            Run away!  Run away!



--
Best Regards,

Mustafa Soysal

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mustafa Soysal               (313) 741-1844 Voice                      TeamOS/2
MISTIK Systems               (313) 741-1937 Fax          Author of UnTieCom(tm)
PO Box 7064                                        Authorised Motorola Reseller
Ann Arbor, MI 48107-7064, USA                            os2@mistik.express.net
               Online catalog:  http://www.express.net/mistik/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5geik4$l1p@client2.news.psi.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5g93c3$1u2$2@ordeal.cts.com> <5gc3dg$lu4@client2.news.psi.net> <RwiKzoHpvKzM092yn@skypoint.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,7905b5083192d203
X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public
From: os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57)
Subject: Re: OS/2 dead? Uh, no. read this.
Date: 1997/03/15
Message-ID: <5geik4$l1p@client2.news.psi.net>
X-Deja-AN: 225752648
Distribution: world
References: <5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5g93c3$1u2$2@ordeal.cts.com> <5gc3dg$lu4@client2.news.psi.net> <RwiKzoHpvKzM092yn@skypoint.com>
Organization: MISTIK Systems (info@express.net for account info) (313) 741-1844
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l