Article View: comp.os.os2.apps
Article #4816Re: OS/2 dead? Uh, no. read this.
From: Mustafa Soysal MS57
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 00:00
63 lines
3432 bytes
3432 bytes
In article <RwiKzoHpvKzM092yn@skypoint.com>,
Richard Steiner <rsteiner@skypoint.com> wrote:
>Here in comp.os.os2.misc, os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57)
>spake unto us, saying:
>
>>UnTieCom(tm) got about 200 customers at most, a lot of them not regisreted.
>>I haven't compiled the exact numbers.
>
>What's UnTieCom? I've never heard of it, and I play around a lot with
>various utilities... Then again, I registered SIO in 1993, so I don't
>look a lot at communications-related things.
>
>>Describe went under, and I hear Stardock is complaining....
>
>DeScribe, Inc. was managed in an "interesting" way, and they made a few
>very bad moves in the past which ended up alienating significant segments
>of their potential market (I avoided their word processor for almost two
>years before I decided to buy it because of one of their proposed schemes
>that they abandoned at the last minute before release).
Well, the worst mistake was the crashing demo version initialy put out.
After that I didn't reconsider since I kept hearing crash reports with
the real product.
>
>>Let's move on to Windows as our finances permit.
>
>Heh. I use Windows 95 a little here (I had little choice in obtaining
>it, since it came with my new machine), and it's not a good replacement
>for Warp 4 for me, which is why I consider my Windows 95 setup more of
>a plaything and spend 95% of my time in Warp.
Well, I can go WIndows 3.1 without having to switch until I have
everthing I need. That's the main reason...Otherwise I would go Windows
NT or linux.
>
>Win95 is decent enough (*certainly* better than Win 3.1), and may have
>some application advantages, but it's FAR too limited as an environment
>in a number of areas that I'm used to. I think *it* really needs a 32-
>bit command line, you know?
>
>--
>-Rich Steiner >>>---> rsteiner@skypoint.com >>>---> Bloomington, MN
> Written offline using PC Yarn + Yep + FTE under OS/2 Warp 4
> Run away! Run away!
--
Best Regards,
Mustafa Soysal
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mustafa Soysal (313) 741-1844 Voice TeamOS/2
MISTIK Systems (313) 741-1937 Fax Author of UnTieCom(tm)
PO Box 7064 Authorised Motorola Reseller
Ann Arbor, MI 48107-7064, USA os2@mistik.express.net
Online catalog: http://www.express.net/mistik/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5geik4$l1p@client2.news.psi.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5g93c3$1u2$2@ordeal.cts.com> <5gc3dg$lu4@client2.news.psi.net> <RwiKzoHpvKzM092yn@skypoint.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6c9c714efb26b18 X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6c9c714efb26b18 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: 112d6c,7905b5083192d203 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d6c,public From: os2@mistik.express.net (Mustafa Soysal MS57) Subject: Re: OS/2 dead? Uh, no. read this. Date: 1997/03/15 Message-ID: <5geik4$l1p@client2.news.psi.net> X-Deja-AN: 225752648 Distribution: world References: <5g51e8$1sta$1@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <5g93c3$1u2$2@ordeal.cts.com> <5gc3dg$lu4@client2.news.psi.net> <RwiKzoHpvKzM092yn@skypoint.com> Organization: MISTIK Systems (info@express.net for account info) (313) 741-1844 Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l