🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <34825dd3$18$qnivqjrv$mr2ice@news.mdi.ca>, nospam@mdi.ca 
says...
> In <3481EB5C.320E@usa.net>, on 12/01/97 
>    at 09:40 AM, Derek Morton <derek.morton@usa.net> said:
> 
> >Isn't this an OS/2 group?
> 
> >Patrick Annette wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Sun, 30 Nov 1997 01:21:58, dmccoy@REMOVE_MEmnsinc.com (David H. McCoy)
> >> wrote:
> >> > You can download the patches just like you can for OS/2.  Were you not
> >> > fella that was "smarter than the average OS/2 user?"
> >> I thought you could only get the OSR2 version of Win95 by purchasing a new
> >> system (or hard drive)?  Where can I download it?
> 
> I think Patrick is just firing another shot at David McCoy's already
> unstable poition...
> 
> BECAUSE OSR2 CANNOT BE DOWNLOADED, YOU WILL NEED TO BUY A COMPUTER TO
> LEGALLY GET IT!... So much for "You can download the patches just like you
> can for OS/2."...
> 
> Go away McCoy, you side steps the main question, and kept spreading lies and
> FUDs around...

According to my latest pricing list it has....
Windows 95 + MS PLUS! + MS Press CD (OEM)
Windows 95 + MS Press CD (OEM)
Now where is OS/2 on this list??...it isn't there. Once again, I am going 
to say that this isn't an advocation for 95. I am just getting sick of 
flames about this, I AM TRYING TO SUPPORT OS/2, I AM TRYING TO GET MY 
FACTS RIGHT, and all you people continue to do is flame me. No wonder 
OS/2 isn't the contolling operating system as it should have been, with 
it's users just continuing to argue about nothing all the time.

> ===Proud Member of Team OS/2, Team OS/2 at Taiwan, ICENews Beta Tester===
> ===================And Bovine Team Warped Key Crucher====================
>                             NUTS' Home Base
>               US Mirror http://www.cybermail.net/~davidwei
>           Taiwanese Mirror http://www.taconet.com.tw/~davidwei
>      ��Ф�Z OS/2 �޳N�s�� <<>> Hope_Net CD-ROM Monthly, OS/2 Editor

What is Team OS/2?? I mean I put my name down about 2 years ago on the 
Team OS/2 web site, but what do you guys actually do, I mean reading a 
lot of the posts in this lists you kinda support the product, but the 
greater of the posts is bagging 95, wouldn't having 100% support of OS/2 
and little bagging of 95 be more beneficial don't you think. Anyway, that 
is just my 2c, take it or leave it. Personally I will continue to support 
OS/2 (with no support from here) and continue to support 95 just as I 
always have.

-- 
---
Terry
------------------------------------------------
terry@gargoyle.apana.org.au        ICQ # 676620
http://gargoyle.apana.org.au/~terry
------------------------------------------------