🚀 go-pugleaf

**>>There has not been much promoting in this discussion, more like a lot of 
**>>flaming due to people comparing OS/2 with Win95, are you guys too scared 
**>>that maybe Win95 is a decent product that does have a strong market 
**>>hold??

Decent product??? ROTFLMAO big time.

Strong market share??? Yea, the Ford Escort has a strong market share.
I wouldn't drive one, but if there are that many M$ lovers in the
world, I'm not surprised that there are that many Ford Escort owners
as well. 

As you can see, market share and quality are not synonymous. Not even
close. Ask any owner of a Mercedes.

** And before you reply, remember that there is currently a group of 
**>>programmers trying to alter the dll's (and others) so that Win95 products
**>> can run under OS/2. Why would you do this if OS/2 products are just as 
**>>good or better??

Just out for an afternoon troll, are you?

If you are smart enought to use a computer, you should be smart enough
to know the difference between Windows95, a M$ piece of shit, and
applications that run on that piece of dung.

You are falling for the M$ movement that says, "everything is part of
the operating system" 

There are applications out there that are written by non M$ companies,
but for some reason, you seem to think that everything that says W95
on it is from M$. Sorry, its not even an intelligent arguement. Its
just chumming the waters, only you are using the wrong bait.

You are just a troll. At least move it to c.o.o.a