🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.bugs
Article #226

Re: USB memory keys -- the plot thickens

#226
From: mbbr
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:06
27 lines
3060 bytes
Dickless Davie tholen@antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
tholed:
> Ilya Zakharevich writes:
>
> >> But wait, there's more!  I copied an executable file from a directory on
> >> the hard disk to the memory key.  The program works just fine when I
> >> launch it from the hard disk.  However, when I try to launch it from the
> >> memory key, OS/2 complains that it can't run the program in an OS/2
> >> session (SYS0191).  The help associated with message 191 says that either
> >> the program is a DOS application or not compatible with OS/2.  Well, it
> >> is definitely not a DOS application, and it most certainly is compatible
> >> with OS/2, because it runs just fine from the hard disk.  I also tried it
> >> with a RAM disk, and the same problem (SYS0191) occurs, so the problem is
> >> apparently related to being run from a FAT16 partition.  Does anybody have
> >> a hard disk partition formatted as FAT16 that can test whether the same
> >> problem occurs in that situation?
> >>
> >> So, question #3?  Why should it matter whether the program resides on an
> >> HPFS partition, JFS partition, or FAT16 partition?
>
> > This should not matter.  What MAY matter is whether the program is
> > launched from a removable disk or not.  Obviously, programs are loaded
> > from a removable media in a different way than from permanent storage.
>
> Is a RAM disk considered "removable media"?

What do you think, if you think you can, Dickless?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1145509584.194904.145010@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <bUi1g.8673$3W1.8224@tornado.socal.rr.com> <e24lb4$ctb$1@agate.berkeley.edu> <2rm1g.5513$543.5305@tornado.socal.rr.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,216ae0f6ce49e269
X-Google-Thread: 1138ec,94b12c41aa608681,start
X-Google-Thread: 102c26,94b12c41aa608681,start
X-Google-Thread: 1156f6,94b12c41aa608681,start
X-Google-Thread: fdc67,94b12c41aa608681,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,gid1138ec,gid102c26,gid1156f6,gidfdc67,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: mbbr@mighty.co.za
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.bugs,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical,demon.local,alt.astronomy
Subject: Re: USB memory keys -- the plot thickens
Date: 19 Apr 2006 22:06:24 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <1145509584.194904.145010@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>
References: <bUi1g.8673$3W1.8224@tornado.socal.rr.com>
   <e24lb4$ctb$1@agate.berkeley.edu>
   <2rm1g.5513$543.5305@tornado.socal.rr.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.211.117.172
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1145509590 15720 127.0.0.1 (20 Apr 2006 05:06:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 05:06:30 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <2rm1g.5513$543.5305@tornado.socal.rr.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=210.211.117.172;
   posting-account=gfDFhQ0AAAD-2SlsgA4JCYtc0KAvRvTc