🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.misc
Article #14748

Re: Image Adapter Drivers

#14748
From: Bill Rubin
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1991 21:38
18 lines
1539 bytes
In <1991Jun26.201629.18424@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> mce3p@turing.acs.virginia.edu (Chris Exley) writes:
> We have about 12 machines with the Image Adapter/A and 8508 Landscape
> monitor.  The adapter came with drivers for Windows/286, OS/2 1.2, and DOS.
> Has a driver been written for Windows 3.0 yet?  I realize that IBM really
> dosen't have any motivation to write it, since IBM is pushing OS/2, but
> I'd really like to see Windows 3.0 in 1600x1200 resolution on a 19"
> display.  If you can give me any information, I'd really appreciate it.
> Thanks!
>
> Chris

My suggestion would be to contact your friendly IBM SE, and tell him to
issue the following command from VM, then put the stuff on diskettes
following the directions he will receive:  "REQUEST IBMIA102 FROM IAATOOLS
AT YMTVM6".  You will end up with 2 diskettes.  One will have OS/2 code, the
other Windows V3 and V2.

-- Bill rubin@watson.ibm.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1991Jun28.213827.1226@watson.ibm.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!soleil!synapse!jvnc.net!princeton!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!bywater!arnor!news

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!soleil!synapse!jvnc.net!princeton!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!bywater!arnor!news
From: rubin@watson.ibm.com (Bill Rubin)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Image Adapter Drivers
Message-ID: <1991Jun28.213827.1226@watson.ibm.com>
Date: 28 Jun 91 21:38:27 GMT
Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
Distribution: usa
Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
Lines: 18
Nntp-Posting-Host: wgros2
Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM