Article View: comp.os.os2.misc
Article #15502OS/2 must ship with systems WAS: Is OS/2 a dead end?
From: Steve.Withers
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 12:22
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 12:22
45 lines
2952 bytes
2952 bytes
In article <1993Jan20.170840.4662@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> jebright@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (James R Ebright) writes: > In article <enk2.60.727548526@po.cwru.edu> enk2@po.cwru.edu (Erik Kovach) writes: > >In article <1993Jan20.163847.26969@cbfsb.cb.att.com> feg@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (forrest.e.gehrke) writes: > >>So, are we all working with a dead end? Are we just > >>whistling while passing the graveyard before > >>Microsoft unloads NT around May of this year? > > > >I think that OS/2 will either explode in popularity, or, which is more > >likely, have a somewhat small but dedicated following comperable to the > >Amiga users...they will be there and have software and generally have an > >impressive operating system, but will lack mainstream support. Who knows... > >from what I hear 'bout NT I am not that impressed with it as I am with OS/2. > > The history of the computer market shows leaders don't always hold the lead. > NT will launch and a lot of folks will talk about it. Then things will > begin to sort out... > > If OS/2 keeps improving, its usage will spread. Right now, it's mostly > by word of mouth :-() OS/2 needs some end-user marketing. Nobody > who isn't a computer jock has ever heard of it...(Sounds like UNIX ten > years ago). "4 out of 5 computer jocks prefer OS/2!" is not as good as > "4 out 5 PC users prefer OS/2!". At risk of starting the FTC thing again.......i just read through most of the ads in the December Computer Shopper (mine comes by boat...OK?). "* includes MSDOS5 and Windows 3.1!" got pretty boring by the 300th ad. A couple mentioned other OS's being available...usually OS/2 was first mentioned as an alternative. But why virtually NO vendors will offer OS/2 as an option has me wondering. People who use OS/2 almost have to go out and *find* it. I don't blame IBM for this completely. The MS lock on the mail-order PC market *is* a virtual monopoly. No one else gets a look in. How can OS/2 get vendors to ship it with systems? I don't know what the answer is: make it $10 a copy to OEMs like MS has done with their software? Steve -- Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz | Space for rent. +64 4 478 4714 | - cheap rates, nice location. **** Happy user of OS/2 b2.1 **** |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan23.122218.13244@actrix.gen.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!Steve.WithersReferences:
<1993Jan20.163847.26969@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <enk2.60.727548526@po.cwru.edu> <1993Jan20.170840.4662@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!Steve.Withers From: Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz Subject: OS/2 must ship with systems WAS: Is OS/2 a dead end? Organization: Actrix Information Exchange Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 12:22:18 GMT Message-ID: <1993Jan23.122218.13244@actrix.gen.nz> Keywords: So quoth Bill Gates References: <1993Jan20.163847.26969@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <enk2.60.727548526@po.cwru.edu> <1993Jan20.170840.4662@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> Sender: Steve.Withers@actrix.gen.nz (Steve Withers) Lines: 45