Article View: comp.os.os2.misc
Article #16176Re: OS/2 must ship with systems
From: Gregory Youngblood
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:12
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 05:12
45 lines
2842 bytes
2842 bytes
apoulsen@athena.mit.edu (Andy Poulsen) writes: > >>>>> On 23 Jan 93 12:22:18 GMT, Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz said: > > >At risk of starting the FTC thing again.......i just read through most of th > >ads in the December Computer Shopper (mine comes by boat...OK?). > > > >"* includes MSDOS5 and Windows 3.1!" > > > >got pretty boring by the 300th ad. A couple mentioned other OS's being > >available...usually OS/2 was first mentioned as an alternative. > > > >But why virtually NO vendors will offer OS/2 as an option has me wondering. > >People who use OS/2 almost have to go out and *find* it. I don't blame IBM f > >this completely. The MS lock on the mail-order PC market *is* a virtual > >monopoly. No one else gets a look in. > > >How can OS/2 get vendors to ship it with systems? I don't know what the answ > >is: make it $10 a copy to OEMs like MS has done with their software? > > i think this is a great idea; however, i think that if it comes with > os/2 it should also come with a boot manager or dual boot option, since > there are a few pieces of software (most notably CAD stuff -- i use > personal designer by computervision) that won't run under os/2 (or > windows, for that matter) because their dos extender doesn't support > dpmi memory (i've heard it's just a command-line option on the compiler, > but couldn't get anyone at the company who knew anything about the > programmer's side of things...). so i still have to boot dos if i want > to use that package. as (if ?) support for os2 grows, then i could run > it under os2. for now, however, i'm stuck booting dos. > > the bottom line is that although i think shipping systems with os2 is a > great idea, there will be people who will need the dos option. (also, > perhaps people are still afraid of a big new thing like os2 and would be > afraid to have it as their only option...) The next step is to have IBM PS/2 and PS/1 systems that are able to ship with OS/2 on it ready to go instead of DOS/Windows. Greg .-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-. . TCS Consulting Services P.O. Box 600008 St. Paul, MN 55106-0008 . . ..!srcsip!tcscs!zeta ..!src.honeywell.com!tcscs!zeta . .-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0uuyXB3w165w@tcscs.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!src.honeywell.com!tcscs!zetaReferences:
<APOULSEN.93Jan24150249@vongole.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!src.honeywell.com!tcscs!zeta From: tcscs!zeta@src.honeywell.com (Gregory Youngblood) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc Subject: Re: OS/2 must ship with systems Message-ID: <0uuyXB3w165w@tcscs.UUCP> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 23:12:20 CST References: <APOULSEN.93Jan24150249@vongole.mit.edu> Reply-To: zeta%tcscs@src.honeywell.com Organization: TCS Consulting Services Lines: 45