Article View: comp.os.os2.misc
Article #16223Re: Is OS/2 a dead end?
From: 177wardell
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:05
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 03:05
47 lines
2418 bytes
2418 bytes
In article <1993Jan24.122036.11172@actrix.gen.nz>, Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz writes: > In article <C18A7s.3rq@news.cso.uiuc.edu> nap42487@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Nishith A. Patel) writes: >> >> It appears the OS/2 advocates were really hoping OS/2 would become successful, >> and when it didn't, they start saying things about how those that put down >> OS/2 will somehow be haunted by what they said when OS/2 rises from the dead >> and makes them look like idiots. Sort of a desparation argument. >> >> DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT. If you bought OS/2 hoping this would happen, you certainlytook a long-shot chance. Just think of it as a DOS multitasker. >> >> BTW, by successful, I mean mainstream, not 1.5 million users. > > You're a bit behind the times.....it's 2 million plus in the first 9 months > and the best release yet is about to hit the streets. > > Word is getting out that OS/2 is a *good thing*. > > Consider: Those 2 million OS/2 users had to *find* the damn thing in order to > run it. I have been checking out Computer Shopper and just about every > computer vendor in there ships DOS and Windows with their machines.....yet > millions have pitched both and run OS/2. > > The distribution channel generally has assumed that OS/2 2.0 was dead before > it started.......but IBM sold 2,000,000 plus copies anyway. Think of what > would have happened if the vendors actually tried to sell OS/2! > > There are still a lot of folk around who think Windows is dross and won't > touch it. > > Steve > About 1/3 of our systems now ship out with OS/2 2.0 preinstalled. We never thought OS/2 would be on any machines a year ago. -Brad > > > > -- > Steve Withers - Wellington, New Zealand | > Steve.Withers@bbs.actrix.gen.nz | Space for rent. > +64 4 478 4714 | - cheap rates, nice location. > **** Happy user of OS/2 b2.1 **** |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan26.220517.7490@gw.wmich.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wmichgw!177wardellReferences:
<1jk2tbINNa5p@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1jkg58INNj3f@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <C18A7s.3rq@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan24.122036.11172@actrix.gen.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!wmichgw!177wardell From: 177wardell@gw.wmich.edu Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy Subject: Re: Is OS/2 a dead end? Message-ID: <1993Jan26.220517.7490@gw.wmich.edu> Date: 26 Jan 93 22:05:17 EST References: <1jk2tbINNa5p@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1jkg58INNj3f@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <C18A7s.3rq@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan24.122036.11172@actrix.gen.nz> Organization: Western Michigan University Lines: 47