Re: Is OS/2 a dead end?

Article View: comp.os.os2.misc

Article #16389

#16389

From: Pat Berry
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 13:22

18 lines
1160 bytes

feg@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (forrest.e.gehrke) writes:

> PC Week for January 18th has an interview with Bill Gates.
> I quote the relevant item:
> 
> PC Week: Your feeling is that OS/2 is a dead-end platform?
> 
> Gates: It's certainly a dead end.  That's indisputable.
> Nobody would dispute that it's a dead end.

Apparently, Gates believes that by forbidding anyone to disagree with
him, he can turn his wishful thinking into fact.  But I dispute his
statement, and so will a lot of other people.  Sorry, Bill.

-- 
Pat Berry - Cary, North Carolina, USA   | "Much to our dismay, the C compiler
pat@berry.Cary.NC.US                    | does not read the manuals."
**** Happy user of OS/2 2.0 ****        | Libes & Ressler, *Life with UNIX*

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Zo6RXB3w165w@berry.Cary.NC.US>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!psinntp!psinntp!dg-rtp!salzo!berry!pat

References: <1993Jan20.163847.26969@cbfsb.cb.att.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!tcsi.com!iat.holonet.net!psinntp!psinntp!dg-rtp!salzo!berry!pat
From: pat@berry.Cary.NC.US (Pat Berry)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Is OS/2 a dead end?
Keywords: So quoth Bill Gates
Message-ID: <Zo6RXB3w165w@berry.Cary.NC.US>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 08:22:58 EST
References: <1993Jan20.163847.26969@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
Organization: Berry Communications
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message