🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.misc
Article #16426

Re: Is OS/2 a dead end?

#16426
From: Gregory Youngblood
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 06:10
32 lines
2316 bytes
dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:

> In article <mortenk.193.727993897@dhhalden.no> mortenk@dhhalden.no (MORTEN KN
> >Well, I have 2x200Meg, and it takes a whole lot less that 5 minutes, 
> >even after a _total_ crash. You will need about a zillion megs to 
> >get 30 minutes (at least).
> 
> How full ar they?  I have a 200MB drive, and (especially before
> service pack level XR-6055) it would take longer as more files were
> added to the system.  Right now, I've a 50MB OS/2 partition (35MB
> used) and a 150MB data partition (110MB used), and it takes about 7
> minutes to inspect the disk after an abnormal reset.  I've only had to
> do this once in the last month, though, and it was a piece of code I
> wrote that caused the crash (I fixed it, so nobody will be getting
> this in their downloads :-)).

First I'm running the normal GA release with the patch for the swapper
file.  CHKDSK /F:3 run during the boot up after a nasty crash does some
repair to the hpfs partition (or something), at least according to the 
IBM rep.  he told me that I when CHKDSK is counting the percent complete and
pauses for a while it is repairing a problem.  he then described the minor
problems as layered on the disk so one pass will get rid of the top layer,
and then the next run will get rid of the next layer, etc.etc, and that I 
should run it until I don't have the delays any longer.  I tried several times
but ran out of time, and it still had the pauses...so I dont know.

Greg

.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.
.   TCS Consulting Services   P.O. Box 600008   St. Paul, MN  55106-0008    .
.   ..!srcsip!tcscs!zeta                 ..!src.honeywell.com!tcscs!zeta    .
.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.-=-.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <48R1XB4w165w@tcscs.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!UB.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!src.honeywell.com!tcscs!zeta
References: <1993Jan26.144322.4054@njitgw.njit.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!UB.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!src.honeywell.com!tcscs!zeta
From: tcscs!zeta@src.honeywell.com (Gregory Youngblood)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
Subject: Re: Is OS/2 a dead end?
Keywords: So quoth Bill Gates
Message-ID: <48R1XB4w165w@tcscs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 00:10:26 CST
References: <1993Jan26.144322.4054@njitgw.njit.edu>
Reply-To: zeta%tcscs@src.honeywell.com
Organization: TCS Consulting Services
Lines: 32