Article View: comp.os.os2.misc
Article #16660Re: What's good about native OS/2
From: William Unruh
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:28
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 20:28
16 lines
1306 bytes
1306 bytes
lowey@jester.usask.ca (CrazyMan) writes: ]3) OS/2 programs run safer. ... ]In OS/2 however, an application may put a clock on the screen because ]it may not want you to change a document while it is being printed for ]example. The difference is you can still move the window around, click on ]other applications, and run them normally. The one program doesn't take ]over the entire machine. Well, in theory, but because of the single input cue, in practice it's not quite so good- eg, if I open a floppy drive, it takes over the whole shell for up to a minute, the terminal emmulator Hogs the input cue badly at times (eg, on disconnect it will hog it until the modem has hung up, no matter what) etc, but they can rarely grab it permanently. So, better, but not yet perfect.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1k6ra6INNsed@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!caen!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!unruhReferences:
<1993Jan26.025458.5813@mcs.kent.edu> <1k6iboINNb74@access.usask.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!rtech!sgiblab!spool.mu.edu!caen!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!unruh From: unruh@physics.ubc.ca (William Unruh) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc Subject: Re: What's good about native OS/2 Date: 27 Jan 1993 20:28:54 GMT Organization: The University of British Columbia Lines: 16 Distribution: world Message-ID: <1k6ra6INNsed@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> References: <1993Jan26.025458.5813@mcs.kent.edu> <1k6iboINNb74@access.usask.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.ubc.ca