🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1k6d7gINNmf5@srvr1.engin.umich.edu>, jwh@citi.umich.edu (Jim Howe) writes...
>I have a machine which has three disk partitions set up.
>One partition contains OS/2 2.0 GA+SP, one contains 
>OS/2 2.1 beta and the third contains my user data.
>Can someone tell me if there will be any complications
>with alternatively running the 2.0 and 2.1 versions?
>Each OS/2 partition has its own Desktop directory, so
>I realize that any Desktop changes made while running
>one version will not be reflected when the other version
>is running.  I'm more concerned about the EA's that
>get stored with the directories in the common partition.
>If I add objects to a folder which resides in the common
>partition, what will happen when I run the other version
>of OS/2.  Will the system get hopelessly confused about
>which objects reside where?  Are there other potential
>configuration problems?  Experiences and comments 
>are welcome.  Thanks.


I currently run OS/2 2.0 GA+SP and OS/2 2.1 beta, booting
one xor the other with no problems.  There are times when
both (primary partitions on different physical drives) 
are available at the same time.  This is very usefull when
I fat finger a CONFIG.SYS file, but I don't do it as a 
rule.  I run HPFS.

/Mike