🚀 go-pugleaf

In <2g7dk5$f2n@nic.umass.edu> quilty@twain.ucs.umass.edu (Lulu of the lotus-eaters) writes:

>Let me make a suggestion for those posting with suggestions for an
>OS/2 wishlist.  Many people have suggested additional useful ideas;
>however, most of these have annotated the *ENTIRE* original list with
>such rather unnecessary comments as "I agree", or "Yes".  This just
>makes reading these posts a pain-in-the-ass, especially where one has
>to read all the way to the end to find substantative comments.

I both agree and disagree. When I wrote my followup, I first decided not to
include anything of the original, except where I disagreed and wanted to
clarify why. Later I changed my mind because: If the list is sent to IBM
to see what changes users want, there's no way to tell which changes *users*
see as higher priority than others. If I add which I agree with, you can
add how many wanted every thing on the list. That way, something only
one person want, is probably less important than something 10 persons want.
   _
/Bjorn.
-- 
// Bjorn Fahller        Phone: +46 920 99719        <Team-OS/2>
// Professorsvagen 91   Keeper of the OS/2 archive at ftp.luth.se
// S-977 51 Lulea       (130.240.18.2). "Unemployed" due to lacking
// Sweden               disk space.