Article View: comp.os.os2.misc
Article #17440Radius XGA-2 vs ATI
From: David J Birnbaum
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1993 23:47
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1993 23:47
45 lines
2812 bytes
2812 bytes
Just got off the phone with a Radius technician Here's the poop: 1) Their XGA-2 card uses IBM's P2 chipset and will use OS/2's XGA drivers. No waiting for proprietary drivers (unlike with a certain other company :-)). (The ATI will work with OS/2's default 8514 drivers, but proprietary drivers could take better advantage of ATI's hardware, and could also provide coprocessor support at resolutions lower than 8514.) 2) There is no EISA Radius card because IBM wouldn't give them a license to produce one, preferring to keep the 32-bit bus market to themselves. But the Radius will work properly, busmastering and all, in an EISA machine, albeit with only 16 bit data transfers. For coprocessed instructions, where not much data moves across the bus, this shouldn't make much of a difference, but some operations aren't covered by coprocessed instructions. 3) The Radius lists for just under $500 because IBM charges plenty for the chipset. Radius insists that this is a low-profit item for them, and that any soaking is courtesy of IBM. 4) The card is available direct from Radius (1-800-5-RADIUS) or through regular distributors. Radius will charge you list price; they said that if I told my dealer to contact his usual distributors, or to call Radius for the names of distributors, I'd save a bit. 5) They sold out their first two production runs and are in the third. 6) They have no benchmarks comparing their card to the ATI EISA Graphics Ultra Pro. Radius guesses that the ATI would nose out the Radius card in an OS/2 EISA system, but only barely. This user is leaning strongly toward Radius, primarily for the convenience of driver support. While 8514 and XGA-2 are both IBM standards, IBM seems more interested in providing quick driver support for XGA-2. But I still wish there was an EISA version. Comments and corrections welcome. --David -- Professor David J. Birnbaum djbpitt+@pitt.edu [Internet] The Royal York Apartments, #802 djbpitt@pittvms [Bitnet] 3955 Bigelow Boulevard voice: 1-412-687-4653 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA fax: 1-412-624-9714
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7679@blue.cis.pitt.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!pitt.edu!djbpittShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1044c2,6f436eeeb19eeb4f,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1044c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,6f436eeeb19eeb4f,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-04-02 22:33:41 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!pitt.edu!djbpitt From: djbpitt@pitt.edu (David J Birnbaum) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,bit.listserv.os2-l Subject: Radius XGA-2 vs ATI Message-ID: <7679@blue.cis.pitt.edu> Date: 2 Apr 93 23:47:50 GMT Sender: news+@pitt.edu Followup-To: comp.os.os2.misc Lines: 45 X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]